Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;23(12):2448-2454.
doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01289-5. Epub 2021 Jul 27.

Residual risk for additional recessive diseases in consanguineous couples

Affiliations
Free article

Residual risk for additional recessive diseases in consanguineous couples

Lama AlAbdi et al. Genet Med. 2021 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: Consanguineous couples are typically counseled based on familial pathogenic variants identified in affected children. The residual risk for additional autosomal recessive (AR) variants, however, remains largely understudied.

Methods: First, we surveyed pedigrees of 1,859 consanguineous families for evidence of more than one AR disease. Second, we mined our database of 1,773 molecularly tested consanguineous families to identify those with more than one AR disease. Finally, we surveyed 88 women from consanguineous unions who have undergone targeted prenatal testing for a familial AR variant and followed the pregnancy outcome (n = 144).

Results: We found suggestive evidence of more than one AR disease in 1.94% of consanguineous pedigrees surveyed. Of 1,773 molecularly characterized consanguineous families, 2.93% had evidence of at least two AR diseases (3.54% for first cousin or closer and 2.72% for second cousin or more distant). Furthermore, we found that in 2.78% of pregnancies negative for the familial variant, the pregnancy outcome was a child with a different AR disease.

Conclusion: Our results show that when counseling consanguineous couples for a familial AR variant, ~3% residual risk for additional AR variants should be discussed. This suggests that a broader testing strategy in consanguineous couples should be considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bittles AH. A community genetics perspective on consanguineous marriage. Community Genet. 2008;11:324–330. - PubMed
    1. Clark DW, Okada Y, Moore K, Mason D, Pirastu N, Gandin I, et al. Associations of autozygosity with a broad range of human phenotypes. Nat Commun. 2019;10:1–17. - DOI
    1. Alkuraya FS. Curt Stern Award address: a more perfect clinical genome—how consanguineous populations contribute to the medical annotation of the human genome. Am J Hum Genet. 2021;108:395–399. - DOI
    1. Alkuraya FS. How the human genome transformed study of rare diseases. Nature. 2021;590:218–219.
    1. Alkuraya F. Impact of new genomic tools on the practice of Clin Genet in consanguineous populations: the Saudi experience. Clin Genet. 2013;84:203–208. - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources