Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul;25(7):795-799.
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23892.

Is Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio a Better Indicator of Sepsis with Gram-positive Bacterial Infection?

Uun Sumardi  1 , Diah R Prihardianti  2 , Primal Sudjana  1
Affiliations

Is Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio a Better Indicator of Sepsis with Gram-positive Bacterial Infection?

Uun Sumardi et al. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2021 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is the main cause of death in infectious diseases that can be caused by gram-negative or gram-positive bacteria. Definitive therapy for sepsis is antibiotics, depending on blood culture results even though it takes time for bacterial growth. Neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR) is a laboratory parameter that can predict bacterial infection in sepsis patients. NLCR is time-and-cost-effective and easy-to-use in daily practice, in sepsis patients infected with gram-negative, gram-positive, and no bacterial growth based on blood culture results.

Materials and methods: This was a comparative study of NLCR and the result of blood culture from sepsis patients. Subjects were obtained from the medical records of patients admitted to our hospital from January 2019 to May 2019. Patients aged over 18 years who were diagnosed with sepsis and had blood culture information were included. Patients with hematological disorder and malignancy were excluded. Sepsis data consisted of gender, age, source of infection, comorbidity, NLCR, and blood culture results.

Results: Ninety-four sepsis subjects met the inclusion criteria, and fifty-one subjects (54.25%)-33 subjects (35.10%) with gram-negative bacterial infection and 18 subjects (19.15%) with gram-positive bacterial infection-were included in the analysis due to the completeness of the data. The median NLCR (IQR) was 17.8 (14.3-30.7) in gram-negative, 31.5 (26.3-95.0) in gram-positive, and 22.8 (15.67-22.75) in no bacterial growth (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: NLCR can distinguish gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial infections. It also can predict the possibility of pathogenic bacteria that cause sepsis.

How to cite this article: Sumardi U, Prihardianti DR, Sudjana P. Is Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Count Ratio a Better Indicator of Sepsis with Gram-positive Bacterial Infection? Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(7):795-799.

Keywords: Blood culture result; Neutrophil–lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR); Sepsis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Source of support: Nil Conflict of interest: None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scattered-dot of NLCR to pathogenic bacteria in blood culture results.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Phua J, Ngerng W, See K, Tay C, Kiong T, Lim H, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of culture-negative versus culture-positive severe sepsis. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R202. doi: 10.1186/cc12896. DOI: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, Shackelford KA, Tsoi D, Kievlan DR, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990–2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet (London, England) 2020;395(10219):200–211. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7. DOI: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parwati I. Pola Mikroba dan kepekaan terhadap berbagai antimikroba Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat DR. Hasan Sadikin Bandung. Divisi mikrobiologi klinik Instalasi Laboratori-um Klinik RSHS; 2017:96–98. p.
    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(2):580–637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af. DOI: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315(8):801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. DOI: - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources