Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep;2(3):100069.
doi: 10.1016/j.infpip.2020.100069. Epub 2020 Jun 9.

Regulation, risk and safety of Faecal Microbiota Transplant

Affiliations
Review

Regulation, risk and safety of Faecal Microbiota Transplant

Blair Merrick et al. Infect Prev Pract. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

From its origins as a left-field, experimental, and even "maverick" intervention, faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is now a well-recognised, accepted, and potentially life-saving therapeutic strategy, for the management of recurrent Clostridiodes difficile infection (rCDI). It is being investigated as a treatment for a growing number of diseases including hepatic encephalopathy and eradication of antimicrobial resistant organisms, and the list of indications will likely expand in the future. There is no universally accepted definition of what FMT is, and its mechanism of action remains incompletely understood; this has likely contributed to the breadth of approaches to regulation depending on interpretation. In the UK FMT is considered a medicinal product, in North America, a biological product, whereas in parts of Europe, it is considered a human cell/tissue product. Regulation seeks to improve quality and safety, however, lack of standardisation creates confusion, and overly restrictive regulation may hamper widespread access and discourage research using FMT. FMT is generally considered safe, especially if rigorous donor screening and testing is conducted. Most short-term risks are associated with the delivery method (e.g. colonoscopy). Longer term risks are less well described but longitudinal follow-up of treated cohorts is in place to assess for this, and no signal towards harm has been found to date. Rarely it has been associated with adverse outcomes including the transmission of antibiotic resistant bacteria, and even death. It is vital patients undergoing FMT are well informed to the currently appreciated risks and benefits before proceeding.

Keywords: Biological agent; Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT); Human tissue/ cell product; Medicinal product; Regulation; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bohnhoff M., Drake B.L., Miller C.P. Effect of streptomycin on susceptibility of intestinal tract to experimental salmonella infection. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1954;86(1):132–137. - PubMed
    1. Zhang L., Dong D., Jiang C., Li Z., Wang X., Peng Y. Insight into alteration of gut microbiota in clostridium difficile infection and asymptomatic C. Difficile colonization. Anaerobe. 2015;34:1–7. - PubMed
    1. Schubert A.M., Rogers M.A., Ring C., Mogle J., Petrosino J.P., Young V.B. Microbiome data distinguish patients with clostridium difficile infection and non-C. difficile-associated diarrhea from healthy controls. MBio. 2014;5(3):e01021. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chang J.Y., Antonopoulos D.A., Kalra A., Tonelli A., Khalife W.T., Schmidt T.M. Decreased diversity of the fecal microbiome in recurrent clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Infect Dis. 2008;197(3):435–438. - PubMed
    1. Dethlefsen L., Relman D.A. Incomplete recovery and individualized responses of the human distal gut microbiota to repeated antibiotic perturbation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(Suppl 1):4554–4561. - PMC - PubMed