Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2021 Jan 28:7:98-102.
doi: 10.1016/j.xjtc.2020.12.044. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Aortic annuloplasty: Subcommissural, intra-annular suture techniques, external and internal rings

Affiliations
Editorial

Aortic annuloplasty: Subcommissural, intra-annular suture techniques, external and internal rings

Jan M Federspiel et al. JTCVS Tech. .

Abstract

Aortic valve repair and valve-preserving root replacement have evolved into increasingly practiced procedures. With increasing experience, the need for an annuloplasty has become more evident, at least for pathologies that involve annular dilatation. To understand the effect of an aortic annuloplasty, it is necessary to know the details of aortic valve and root anatomy. Geometrically, the functional annulus is best defined as the virtual basal ring, ie, plane of the cusp nadirs. The sinotubular diameter also influences the aortic valve form, at least in tricuspid valves. Different annuloplasty concepts have been developed for isolated valve repair or in combination with root remodeling, such as subcommissural sutures, suture annuloplasty, external, and internal rings. Subcommissural sutures do not consistently provide durable annular stabilization. More positive results have been published for circular approaches, ie, suture annuloplasty, external, or internal rings. The results of different techniques are difficult to judge because most outcome data have not been analyzed with control of confounding predictors of repair failure. The evidence that annuloplasty improves aortic valve function and repair durability is best documented for isolated bicuspid aortic valve repair. In summary, the addition of annuloplasty to aortic valve reconstruction is probably a useful tool to improve valve competence and stabilize the repair. This is best documented for isolated bicuspid valve repair and circular approaches. The relative benefit of individual concepts is difficult to judge because of lack of both control groups and control of confounding factors.

Keywords: annuloplasty; aortic valve; aortic valve reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Determinants of aortic valve and root geometry. gH, Geometric height; eH, effective height.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Geometric determinants of aortic valve form. Schematic drawing of the geometric determinants of aortic valve form. The anatomic annulus is a crown-shaped structure. The probably more important root dimensions are the virtual basal ring (= functional annulus) and sinotubular junction. gH, Geometric height; eH, effective height.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Localization of the ventriculoaortic junction. The anatomic ventriculoaortic junction differs from the functional annulus and is best seen by the extent of muscle in the sinus portion of the root. It is not infrequently more than 5 mm above the level of the annulus, particularly in the right sinus. NCC, Noncoronary cusp; LCC, left coronary cusp; RCC, right coronary cusp.

Comment in

References

    1. Lansac E., Di Centa I., Sleilaty G., Lejeune S., Berrebi A., Zacek P., et al. Remodeling root repair with an external aortic ring annuloplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:1033–1042. - PubMed
    1. Kunihara T., Arimura S., Sata F., Giebels C., Schneider U., Schäfers H.J. Aortic annulus does not dilate over time after aortic root remodeling with or without annuloplasty. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018;155:885–894.e3. - PubMed
    1. Matsushima S., Karliova I., Gauer S., Miyahara S., Schäfers H.J. Geometry of cusp and root determines aortic valve function. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;36(Suppl 1):64–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson R.H. Clinical anatomy of the aortic root. Heart. 2000;84:670–673. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marom G., Haj-Ali R., Rosenfeld M., Schäfers H.J., Raanani E. Aortic root numeric model: annulus diameter prediction of effective height and coaptation in post-aortic valve repair. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:406–411.e1. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources