Physician leaders' cross-boundary use of social media: what are the implications in the current COVID-19 environment?
- PMID: 34319016
- DOI: 10.1108/LHS-06-2020-0040
Physician leaders' cross-boundary use of social media: what are the implications in the current COVID-19 environment?
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to better understand social media (SM) factors that physician leaders need to consider, as they adapt their cross-boundary practices to engage with colleagues and patients. Firstly, this study explores why SM is being used by physicians to cross horizontal (physician to physician) and stakeholder (physician to patient) boundaries prior to COVID-19. Secondly, based on the studies reviewed, this study provides insights on the practical SM implications for physician leaders working in the COVID-19 environment to actively enhance their practices, reduce public confusion and improve patient care, thus informing health-care practices.
Design/methodology/approach: A systematic literature review was used to conduct a structured transparent overview of peer reviewed articles that describe physicians' use of cross-boundary SM across several disciplines (e.g. health, information science). As a baseline assessment prior to COVID-19, the review synthesized 47 articles, identified and selected from six databases and Novanet. This study used NVivo 12 to thematical code the articles, leading to the emergence of four broad factors that influence SM use.
Findings: A key reason noted in the literature for physicians use of SM to cross horizontal boundaries is to share knowledge. Regarding stakeholder boundaries, the most cited reasons are to improve patient's health and encourage behavioural changes. Insights garnered on the practical SM implications include the need for physicians to be stronger leaders in presenting trustworthy and consistent facts about health information to the public and fellow peers. As role models for the effective use of SM tools, physician leaders can mentor and coach their colleagues and counterparts.
Research limitations/implications: As this was a literature review, the authors did not collect primary data to further explore this rapidly changing and dynamic SM world. Next steps could include a survey to determine firstly, how physicians currently use SM in this COVID-19 environment, and secondly, how they could leverage it for their work. Findings from this survey will help us better understand the role of physician leaders as health-care influencers and how they could better create trust and inform the Canadian public in the health information that is being conveyed.
Practical implications: Physician leaders can play a key role in positively influencing institutional support for ethical and safe SM use and engagement practices. Physicians need to participate in developing regulations and guidelines that are fundamentally to physician leader's SM use. Central to this research would be the need to understand how physicians cross-boundary practices have changed during and potentially post COVID-19. Physician leaders also need to monitor information sources for credibility and ensure that these sources are protected. As role models for the effective use of SM tools, physician leaders can mentor and coach their colleagues and counterparts in this area.
Originality/value: Although there have been studies of how physicians use SM, fewer studies explore why physician leaders' cross boundaries (horizontal and stakeholder) using SM. Important insights are gained in physician leaders practical use of SM. Key themes that emerged included: organizational and individual, information, professional and regulations and guideline factors. These factors strengthen physician leaders understanding of areas of foci to enhance their cross-boundary interactions. There is an urgency to study the complexity of SM and the effectiveness of regulations and guidelines for physicians, who are being required, at an accelerated rate, to strengthen and increase their cross-boundary practices.
Keywords: COVID-19; Cross-boundary; Physician leaders; Social media.
© Emerald Publishing Limited.
Similar articles
-
Leading through the first wave of COVID: a Canadian action research study.Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2021 Dec 15;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/LHS-05-2021-0042. Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2021. PMID: 34898142
-
In their own words: describing Canadian physician leadership.Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2016 Jul 4;29(3):264-81. doi: 10.1108/LHS-12-2015-0045. Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2016. PMID: 27397749
-
Leadership for quality improvement in group practices.Med Care. 1996 Sep;34(9 Suppl):SS40-51. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199609002-00005. Med Care. 1996. PMID: 8792788 Clinical Trial.
-
COVID-19, Social Media, and the Role of the Public Physician.Blood Purif. 2021;50(4-5):595-601. doi: 10.1159/000512707. Epub 2021 Jan 14. Blood Purif. 2021. PMID: 33445176 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Physician leadership and health information exchange: literature review.BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019 Aug;26(1):e100080. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2019-100080. BMJ Health Care Inform. 2019. PMID: 31444230 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Why should we care about social media codes of conduct in healthcare organisations? A systematic literature review.Z Gesundh Wiss. 2023 Apr 10:1-13. doi: 10.1007/s10389-023-01894-5. Online ahead of print. Z Gesundh Wiss. 2023. PMID: 37361317 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Abidi, S. (2017), “A knowledge-modeling approach to integrate multiple clinical practice guidelines to provide evidence-based clinical decision support for managing comorbid conditions”, Journal of Medical Systems, Vol. 41 No. 12, pp. 1-19.
-
- Adilman, R., Rajmohan, Y., Brooks, E., Urgoiti, G.R., Chung, C., Hammad, N., Trinkaus, M., Naseem, M. and Simmons, C. (2016), “ReCAP: social media use among physicians and trainees: results of a national medical oncology physician survey”, Journal of Oncology Practice, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 79-80, doi: 10.1200/JOP.2015.006429.
-
- Ahern, D.K., Woods, S.S., Lightowler, M.C., Finley, S.W. and Houston, T.K. (2011), “Promise of and potential for patient-facing technologies to enable meaningful use”, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 40 No. 5, pp. S162-S172.
-
- Bibault, J., Leroy, T., Blanchard, P., Biau, J., Cervellera, M., Diaz, O., Faivre, J.C., Fumagalli, I., Lescut, N., Martin, V., Pichon, B., Riou, O., Thureau, S. and Giraud, P. (2014), “Mobile technology and social media in the clinical practice of young radiation oncologists: results of a comprehensive nationwide cross-sectional study”, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, Vol. 90 No. 1, pp. 231-237, doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.05.012.
-
- Bokolo, A.J. (2021), “Application of telemedicine and eHealth technology for clinical services in response to COVID-19 pandemic”, Health and Technology, pp. 1-8.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials