Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar/Apr;43(2):495-506.
doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001106.

Evaluation of Remote Check: A Clinical Tool for Asynchronous Monitoring and Triage of Cochlear Implant Recipients

Affiliations

Evaluation of Remote Check: A Clinical Tool for Asynchronous Monitoring and Triage of Cochlear Implant Recipients

Saji Maruthurkkara et al. Ear Hear. 2022 Mar/Apr.

Abstract

Background: A new Remote Check App permits remote self-testing of hearing function for Nucleus cochlear implant (CI) recipients and enables asynchronous review by their clinician to support patient-management decisions.

Objectives: To evaluate the Remote Check App for: (1) ease of use; (2) overall acceptance of the test battery by CI recipient or their carer in the home setting; (3) test-retest reliability of audiological threshold and speech recognition measures via wireless streaming; and (4) to compare outcomes from patient-driven measures with conventional clinician-driven measurements of aided-hearing function.

Design: Single-site, prospective, repeated-measures cohort study with 32 experienced CI users (28 adults and 4 children).

Methods: Participants completed self-testing using the Remote Check app at home and in the clinic. Measures include audiological, objective and subjective tests. Self-administered speech recognition in noise, via the digit triplets test (DTT) and aided thresholds, via the aided threshold test (ATT) were reassessed in free-field and by clinicians following conventional clinical protocols. Results of ATT and DTT were compared across test conditions. Completion time and perceived ease of self-driven assessments were documented. Insights from subsequent real-world experience with Remote Check are summarized and compared to the study findings.

Results: Remote Check was rated as easy to use by the majority (87%) of subjects. Mean group test-retest score differences for self-administered testing within the clinic versus at-home environments were nonsignificant (p > 0.05): 1.4 dB (SD = 1.97) for ATT and 1.6 dB (SD = 1.54) for DTT. Mean group test-retest score difference for patient-driven DTT in streamed versus the free-field condition was 1.8 dB (SD = 2.02). Self-administered, streamed, ATT via Remote Check, resulted in significantly lower thresholds compared to clinician-driven warble-tone thresholds in the free-field by 6.7 dB (SD = 6.8) (p < 0.001). ATT thresholds via Remote Check were not significantly different from predicted thresholds based on the Threshold Sound Pressure Level of the sound processor.

Conclusion: Remote Check is the first CI telehealth assessment tool that uses wireless streaming to enable comprehensive, easy and reliable self-testing of hearing function by the CI recipient or their carer, in the comfort of their home. Asynchronous access to test results can assist clinicians in monitoring and triaging individuals for appropriate patient-management based on their needs. Use of remote monitoring may also help to reduce the burden of unnecessary clinic visits on clinic resources, patient travel time and associated costs. Remote Check is an important step toward addressing the current growing need for asynchronous audiological telepractice to support long-term care of CI recipients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Diagram of Remote Check. (1) Clinician schedules Remote Check; (2) check available at scheduled time; (3) recipient complete Remote Check; (4) results uploaded; and (5) clinician reviews results on mCP.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Individual speech reception thresholds with digit triplet test for 32 participants (52 ears) via Remote Check. The scores for children (C), minimum, maximum, 25th (P25), 50th (P50), and 75th (P75) percentile points are highlighted.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Grouped mean aided thresholds with self-tested aided threshold test, clinician-driven audiometry compared to the predicted thresholds based on threshold sound pressure level of the sound processor.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Academy of Audiology. Cochlear implant practice guidelines. (2019). https://www.audiology.org/sites/default/files/publications/resources/Coc.... - PubMed
    1. American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels For Audiometric Test Rooms (ANSI/ASA S3.1-R2018). (2018). https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/asa/ansiasas31999r2018
    1. Archbold S. M., Nikolopoulos T. P., Lloyd-Richmond H. Long-term use of cochlear implant systems in paediatric recipients and factors contributing to non-use. Cochlear Implants Int, (2009). 10, 25–40. - PubMed
    1. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA). Guidelines for Manual Pure-Tone Threshold Audiometry. (2005). https://www.asha.org/policy/gl2005-00014/
    1. Ayas M., Ali Al Amadi A. M. H., Khaled D., Alwaa A. M. Impact of COVID-19 on the access to hearing health care services for children with cochlear implants: A survey of parents. F1000Res, (2020). 9, 690. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types