Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2021 Jul 28;22(1):502.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05452-w.

Randomised study within a trial (SWAT) to evaluate personalised versus standard text message prompts for increasing trial participant response to postal questionnaires (PROMPTS)

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomised study within a trial (SWAT) to evaluate personalised versus standard text message prompts for increasing trial participant response to postal questionnaires (PROMPTS)

Lucy Cureton et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Use of a person's name in a text message has been shown to be effective in instigating behaviour change. We evaluated the effectiveness of a personalised text message (including the recipient's name) versus a standardised text message for prompting a response from trial participants to complete and return postal follow-up questionnaires.

Methods: Using a randomised study within a trial (SWAT) embedded within the host GRASP (Getting it Right: Addressing Shoulder Pain) trial, participants who provided a mobile telephone number were randomised (1:1) by a central computer system to receive either (1) a personalised text message which included their name or (2) a standard text message. Text messages were sent by the trial office on the same day as the 6-month GRASP follow-up questionnaire. The primary outcome was questionnaire response rate, defined as the proportion of 6-month GRASP follow-up questionnaires returned by participants. Secondary outcomes included time to response, the proportion of participants sent a reminder follow-up questionnaire, and cost.

Results: Between March 2017 and May 2019 (recruitment period for GRASP trial), 618 participants were randomised to a personalised (n = 309) or standard (n = 309) text message and all were included in the analysis. The overall questionnaire response rate was 87% (n = 537/618); 90% (n = 277/309) of participants responded in the personalised text message group compared to 84% (n = 260/309) in the standard text message group (relative risk (RR) 1.07; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.13). Participants randomised to receive the personalised text message were more likely to return their initial postal questionnaire than those who received the standard text message (n = 185/309; 60% vs. n = 160/309; 52%) (RR 1.16; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.33); this represents an absolute percentage difference between intervention groups of 8%. Post hoc subgroup analysis showed that males under 65 years were the group most likely to return their initial questionnaire if they received a personalised text message.

Conclusion: Overall, participants who received a personalised text message were more likely to return their questionnaire than those who received the standard text message.

Trial registration: GRASP Trial ISRCTN16539266 ; SWAT Repository ID 35.

Keywords: Postal questionnaire; Randomised controlled trial; Retention; Study within a trial; Trial methodology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no completing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of participants at each stage. 1Reasons for not receiving allocation: message not sent in error (n = 10), incorrect mobile number (n = 5), randomised in error (n = 4), and patient withdrawn from host trial (n = 3). 2Reasons for not receiving allocation: message not sent in error (n = 12), incorrect mobile number (n = 4), randomised in error (n = 2), and patient withdrawn from host trial (n = 2). Incorrect mobile number, participant provided 10 not 11 digit mobile telephone number
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test of time to overall response personalised and standard text messages (n = 618)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test of time to response for initial questionnaire for personalised and standard text messages (n = 344)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Personalised versus standard text message: overall questionnaire response rate
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Personalised versus standard text message: reminder questionnaire sent

References

    1. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Wentz R, Kwan I. Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires: systematic review. Bmj. 2002;324(7347):1183. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1183. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nakash RA, Hutton JL, Jørstad-Stein EC, Gates S, Lamb SE. Maximising response to postal questionnaires--a systematic review of randomised trials in health research. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-6-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brueton VC, Tierney JF, Stenning S, Meredith S, Harding S, Nazareth I, Rait G. Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials: a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2014;4(2):e003821. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003821. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fewtrell MS, Kennedy K, Singhal A, Martin RM, Ness A, Hadders-Algra M, Koletzko B, Lucas A. How much loss to follow-up is acceptable in long-term randomised trials and prospective studies? Arch Dis Child. 2008;93(6):458–461. doi: 10.1136/adc.2007.127316. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Sample size slippages in randomised trials: exclusions and the lost and wayward. Lancet. 2002;359(9308):781–785. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07882-0. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources