Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jul 28;12(1):4579.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24861-8.

An umbrella review of the evidence associating diet and cancer risk at 11 anatomical sites

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

An umbrella review of the evidence associating diet and cancer risk at 11 anatomical sites

Nikos Papadimitriou et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

There is evidence that diet and nutrition are modifiable risk factors for several cancers, but associations may be flawed due to inherent biases. Nutritional epidemiology studies have largely relied on a single assessment of diet using food frequency questionnaires. We conduct an umbrella review of meta-analyses of observational studies to evaluate the strength and validity of the evidence for the association between food/nutrient intake and risk of developing or dying from 11 primary cancers. It is estimated that only few single food/nutrient and cancer associations are supported by strong or highly suggestive meta-analytic evidence, and future similar research is unlikely to change this evidence. Alcohol consumption is positively associated with risk of postmenopausal breast, colorectal, esophageal, head & neck and liver cancer. Consumption of dairy products, milk, calcium and wholegrains are inversely associated with colorectal cancer risk. Coffee consumption is inversely associated with risk of liver cancer and skin basal cell carcinoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Scatter plot showing results from the umbrella review grading the evidence on diet and cancer risk.
The Y-axis shows the strength of the evidence. The upper half displays associations that increase cancer risk (in red), whereas the bottom half shows associations that reduce cancer risk (in green). The different point symbols and color intensity represent the different levels of evidence grading. Points colored in gray denote no statistically significant associations. The X-axis corresponds to the different cancer sites. BCC basal cell carcinoma, MHT menopausal hormone therapy, UADT upper aerodigestive tract.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Forest plot showing results that achieved strong or highly suggestive evidence from the umbrella review on diet and cancer risk.
Data are presented as relative risks and 95% confidence intervals. BCC basal cell carcinoma, MHT menopausal hormone therapy, UADT upper aerodigestive tract.

References

    1. Bray F, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:394–424. - PubMed
    1. World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research. Diet, nutrition, physical activity and cancer: a global perspective. https://www.aicr.org/research/third-expert-report/ (2018).
    1. Ioannidis JP. Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology. 2008;19:640–648. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31818131e7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e124. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dwan K, Gamble C, Williamson PR, Kirkham JJ, Reporting Bias Group. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e66844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066844. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types