Does endoscopic intervention prevent subsequent gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with left ventricular assist devices? A retrospective study
- PMID: 34321851
- PMCID: PMC8291026
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i25.3877
Does endoscopic intervention prevent subsequent gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with left ventricular assist devices? A retrospective study
Abstract
Background: Patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are at increased risk for recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) and repeat endoscopic procedures. We assessed the frequency of endoscopy for GIB in patients with LVADs and the impact of endoscopic intervention on preventing a subsequent GIB.
Aim: To evaluate for an association between endoscopic intervention and subsequent GIB. Secondary aims were to assess the frequency of GIB in our cohort, describe GIB presentations and sources identified, and determine risk factors for recurrent GIB.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients at a large academic institution who underwent LVAD implantation from January 2011 - December 2018 and assessed all hospital encounters for GIB through December 2019. We performed a descriptive analysis of the GIB burden and the outcome of endoscopic procedures performed. We performed multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the association between endoscopic intervention and subsequent GIB.
Results: In the cohort of 295 patients, 97 (32.9%) had at least one GIB hospital encounter. There were 238 hospital encounters, with 55.4% (132/238) within the first year of LVAD implantation. GIB resolved on its own by discharge in 69.8% (164/235) encounters. Recurrent GIB occurred in 55.5% (54/97) of patients, accounting for 59.2% (141/238) of all encounters. Of the 85.7% (204/238) of encounters that included at least one endoscopic evaluation, an endoscopic intervention was performed in 34.8% (71/204). The adjusted odds ratio for subsequent GIB if an endoscopic intervention was performed during a GIB encounter was not significant (odds ratio 1.18, P = 0.58).
Conclusion: Patients implanted with LVADs whom experience recurrent GIB frequently undergo repeat admissions and endoscopic procedures. In this retrospective cohort study, adherence to endoscopic guidelines for performing endoscopic interventions did not significantly decrease the odds of subsequent GIB, thus suggesting the uniqueness of the LVAD population. A prospective study is needed to identify patients with LVAD at risk of recurrent GIB and determine more effective management strategies.
Keywords: Endoscopic intervention, Inpatient care; Gastrointestinal bleeding; Hospital readmissions; Left ventricular-assist device; Recurrent bleeding.
©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: Birati EY is recipient of research grants through the University from Impulse Dynamics and Medtronic. No relevant conflicts of interest to this manuscript; Fisher L site principle investigator for a Medtronic trial regarding video capsule endoscopy, but not related to LVADs. No relevant conflicts of interest to this manuscript; No disclosures or COI for the other authors.
Similar articles
-
Timing of Gastrointestinal Bleeding After Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices Associates With Anatomic Location, Presentation, and Management.Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Feb;17(3):448-454. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.056. Epub 2018 Jun 12. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019. PMID: 29906524
-
Risk Factors and Outcomes of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients.Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 15;117(2):240-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.041. Epub 2015 Nov 6. Am J Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 26651456
-
Clinical Predictors for Repeat Hospitalizations in Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) Patients With Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Gastroenterology Res. 2018 Apr;11(2):100-105. doi: 10.14740/gr972w. Epub 2018 Apr 7. Gastroenterology Res. 2018. PMID: 29707076 Free PMC article.
-
Angiotensin II antagonists and gastrointestinal bleeding in left ventricular assist devices: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Int J Artif Organs. 2021 Mar;44(3):215-220. doi: 10.1177/0391398820951811. Epub 2020 Aug 25. Int J Artif Organs. 2021. PMID: 32842844
-
Gastrointestinal bleeding with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices.Clin J Gastroenterol. 2015 Apr;8(2):63-7. doi: 10.1007/s12328-015-0551-5. Epub 2015 Jan 24. Clin J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25614135 Review.
Cited by
-
Thrombotic and Hemorrhagic Complications Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement: An Emphasis on Gastrointestinal Bleeding, Stroke, and Pump Thrombosis.Cureus. 2023 Dec 27;15(12):e51160. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51160. eCollection 2023 Dec. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 38283491 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Partial Pressure of End-Tidal Oxygen and Blood Lactate During Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Healthy Older Participants and Patients at Risk of Cardiac Disease.Cardiol Res. 2024 Feb;15(1):29-36. doi: 10.14740/cr1597. Epub 2024 Feb 28. Cardiol Res. 2024. PMID: 38464709 Free PMC article.
-
Pre- and Post-Implant Endoscopy in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients: A Single-Center Experience.Gastroenterology Res. 2024 Feb;17(1):1-9. doi: 10.14740/gr1661. Epub 2024 Feb 28. Gastroenterology Res. 2024. PMID: 38463148 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Tabibian JH, Rhoades DP, Forde KA, McLean RC, Chandrasekhara V. Timing of Gastrointestinal Bleeding After Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices Associates With Anatomic Location, Presentation, and Management. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17:448–454. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical