Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 11;13(31):37809-37815.
doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c07952. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

High Energy Density Single-Crystal NMC/Li6PS5Cl Cathodes for All-Solid-State Lithium-Metal Batteries

Affiliations

High Energy Density Single-Crystal NMC/Li6PS5Cl Cathodes for All-Solid-State Lithium-Metal Batteries

Christopher Doerrer et al. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. .

Abstract

To match the high capacity of metallic anodes, all-solid-state batteries require high energy density, long-lasting composite cathodes such as Ni-Mn-Co (NMC)-based lithium oxides mixed with a solid-state electrolyte (SSE). However in practice, cathode capacity typically fades due to NMC cracking and increasing NMC/SSE interface debonding because of NMC pulverization, which is only partially mitigated by the application of a high cell pressure during cycling. Using smart processing protocols, we report a single-crystal particulate LiNi0.83Mn0.06Co0.11O2 and Li6PS5Cl SSE composite cathode with outstanding discharge capacity of 210 mA h g-1 at 30 °C. A first cycle coulombic efficiency of >85, and >99% thereafter, was achieved despite a 5.5% volume change during cycling. A near-practical discharge capacity at a high areal capacity of 8.7 mA h cm-2 was obtained using an asymmetric anode/cathode cycling pressure of only 2.5 MPa/0.2 MPa.

Keywords: composite cathode; interfacial contact; pressure dependence; single-crystal NMC; solid-state battery; stack pressure; sulfide electrolyte; volume expansion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) SEM micrograph of the as-supplied SC-NMC powder and (b) corresponding particle size distribution. SEM micrograph of the (c) in-house LPSCl-SP used in the composite cathode and (d) as-supplied LPSCl-LP used in the SSE separator. (e) Ionic conductivity of LPSCl powders as a function of pressure, and (f) XRD spectra of the LPSCl powders.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Schematic of the cell manufacturing steps, (b) cross-section of a SC-NMC/LPSCl composite cathode after cell assembly and before cycling, and (c) EDX element maps for carbon, sulfur, and nickel.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Initial charge/discharge curves (with average voltages UC and UDC) of a SC-NMC/LPSCl composite cathode (14 mg cm–2, 3 mA h cm–2) cycled at 2.5 MPa, 0.2 mA cm–2, 30 °C and the (b) differential capacity. (c) Ex situ XRD spectra before cycling, after charge and discharge. (d) Cathode cross-section after charging with some loss of contact at the SC-NMC/LPSCl interface and particle separation of previously agglomerated crystals.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Charge/discharge curves of a SC-NMC/LPSCl composite cathode (14 mg cm–2, 3 mA h cm–2) with a Li anode, and capacity fade (inset) at (a) 2.5 and (b) 10 MPa. (c) Discharge capacity at different current densities and higher cycle numbers of the same SC-NMC/LPSCl cathode with a LTO/LPSCl composite anode cycled at 10 MPa.
Figure 5
Figure 5
(a) Asymmetric load cell setup used to lower the cathode stack pressure while maintaining anode pressure. Corresponding voltage capacity curves for a cell cycled at 0.2 mA cm–2 and an anode/cathode pressure of 2.5 MPa/0.2 MPa for a (b) SC-NMC/LPSCl composite cathode of 14 mg cm–2 (3 mA h cm–2), and capacity fade compared to different pressures and a (c) SC-NMC/LPSCl composite cathode of 43 mg cm–2 (8.7 mA h cm–2). (d) Discharge capacity comparison for Ni-rich composite cathodes pressed at RT as a function of the stack pressure during cycling.

References

    1. Janek J.; Zeier W. G. A Solid Future for Battery Development. Nat. Energy 2016, 1, 16141.10.1038/nenergy.2016.141. - DOI
    1. Pasta M.; Armstrong D.; Brown Z. L.; Bu J.; Castell M. R.; Chen P.; Clocks A.; Corr S. A.; Cussen E. J.; Darnbrough E.; et al. 2020 Roadmap on Solid-State Batteries. J. Phys.: Energy 2020, 2, 032008.10.1088/2515-7655/ab95f4. - DOI
    1. Cao D.; Zhao Y.; Sun X.; Natan A.; Wang Y.; Xiang P.; Wang W.; Zhu H. Processing Strategies to Improve Cell-Level Energy Density of Metal Sulfide Electrolyte-Based All-Solid-State Li Metal Batteries and Beyond. ACS Energy Lett. 2020, 5, 3468–3489. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c01905. - DOI
    1. Schnell J.; Günther T.; Knoche T.; Vieider C.; Köhler L.; Just A.; Keller M.; Passerini S.; Reinhart G. All-Solid-State Lithium-Ion and Lithium Metal Batteries – Paving the Way to Large-Scale Production. J. Power Sources 2018, 382, 160–175. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.02.062. - DOI
    1. Wenzel S.; Sedlmaier S. J.; Dietrich C.; Zeier W. G.; Janek J. Interfacial Reactivity and Interphase Growth of Argyrodite Solid Electrolytes at Lithium Metal Electrodes. Solid State Ionics 2018, 318, 102–112. 10.1016/j.ssi.2017.07.005. - DOI