Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul 29;11(1):15417.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94964-1.

Dialysis adequacy predictions using a machine learning method

Affiliations

Dialysis adequacy predictions using a machine learning method

Hyung Woo Kim et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Dialysis adequacy is an important survival indicator in patients with chronic hemodialysis. However, there are inconveniences and disadvantages to measuring dialysis adequacy by blood samples. This study used machine learning models to predict dialysis adequacy in chronic hemodialysis patients using repeatedly measured data during hemodialysis. This study included 1333 hemodialysis sessions corresponding to the monthly examination dates of 61 patients. Patient demographics and clinical parameters were continuously measured from the hemodialysis machine; 240 measurements were collected from each hemodialysis session. Machine learning models (random forest and extreme gradient boosting [XGBoost]) and deep learning models (convolutional neural network and gated recurrent unit) were compared with multivariable linear regression models. The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean square error (RMSE), and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (Corr) for each model using fivefold cross-validation were calculated as performance measurements. The XGBoost model had the best performance among all methods (MAPE = 2.500; RMSE = 2.906; Corr = 0.873). The deep learning models with convolutional neural network (MAPE = 2.835; RMSE = 3.125; Corr = 0.833) and gated recurrent unit (MAPE = 2.974; RMSE = 3.230; Corr = 0.824) had similar performances. The linear regression models had the lowest performance (MAPE = 3.284; RMSE = 3.586; Corr = 0.770) compared with other models. Machine learning methods can accurately infer hemodialysis adequacy using continuously measured data from hemodialysis machines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scatter plots of URR and the predicted value for each model using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient and the best fit line. (A) Linear regression (R = 0.771). (B) Random forest (R = 0.864). (C) XGBoost (R = 0.873). (D) Deep learning with convolutional neural network (R = 0.834). URR urea reduction ratio, XGBoost extreme gradient boosting.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Random forest and XGBoost feature importance plots. XGBoost extreme gradient boosting, MSE mean squared error, SD standard deviation, BFR blood flow rate, DFR dialysate flow rate, UV ultrafiltration volume.

References

    1. Gotch FA, Sargent JA. A mechanistic analysis of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS) Kidney Int. 1985;28:526–534. doi: 10.1038/ki.1985.160. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lowrie EG, Laird NM, Parker TF, Sargent JA. Effect of the hemodialysis prescription of patient morbidity: Report from the National Cooperative Dialysis Study. N. Engl. J. Med. 1981;305:1176–1181. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198111123052003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. National Kidney F. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for hemodialysis adequacy: 2015 update. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2015;66:884–930. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.07.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Owen WF, Jr, Lew NL, Liu Y, Lowrie EG, Lazarus JM. The urea reduction ratio and serum albumin concentration as predictors of mortality in patients undergoing hemodialysis. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993;329:1001–1006. doi: 10.1056/nejm199309303291404. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sherman RA, Cody RP, Rogers ME, Solanchick JC. Accuracy of the urea reduction ratio in predicting dialysis delivery. Kidney Int. 1995;47:319–321. doi: 10.1038/ki.1995.41. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types