Toward an experimental analysis of verbal shaping in psychotherapy

Abstract

AbstractObjective. Some authors have suggested that verbal shaping is an active component in cognitive restructuring. The goal of the current study was to provide experimental evidence in support of the shaping hypothesis.

Method: Three consecutively admitted adults with symptoms of anxiety and depression participated in the study. Participants underwent baseline, treatment comparison, crossover, and follow-up phases as part of an experimental single-case study. We selected two target irrational beliefs and praised either the client's approximations to a terminal (more adaptive) class of verbalizations (differential reinforcement of approximations) or just the terminal class of verbalizations (terminal reinforcement).

Results: Irrational beliefs exposed to differential reinforcement of approximations was a more effective approach to reducing irrational beliefs.

Conclusion: The study provides experimental evidence in support of the verbal shaping hypothesis. Our findings suggest that it may be possible to enhance clinical outcomes by actively engaging in verbal shaping during client-therapist verbal interaction.

Keywords: Socratic dialogue; irrational belief; processes of change; verbal shaping.