Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct:125:105020.
doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.105020. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

Progress towards an OECD reporting framework for transcriptomics and metabolomics in regulatory toxicology

Affiliations

Progress towards an OECD reporting framework for transcriptomics and metabolomics in regulatory toxicology

Joshua A Harrill et al. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Omics methodologies are widely used in toxicological research to understand modes and mechanisms of toxicity. Increasingly, these methodologies are being applied to questions of regulatory interest such as molecular point-of-departure derivation and chemical grouping/read-across. Despite its value, widespread regulatory acceptance of omics data has not yet occurred. Barriers to the routine application of omics data in regulatory decision making have been: 1) lack of transparency for data processing methods used to convert raw data into an interpretable list of observations; and 2) lack of standardization in reporting to ensure that omics data, associated metadata and the methodologies used to generate results are available for review by stakeholders, including regulators. Thus, in 2017, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Extended Advisory Group on Molecular Screening and Toxicogenomics (EAGMST) launched a project to develop guidance for the reporting of omics data aimed at fostering further regulatory use. Here, we report on the ongoing development of the first formal reporting framework describing the processing and analysis of both transcriptomic and metabolomic data for regulatory toxicology. We introduce the modular structure, content, harmonization and strategy for trialling this reporting framework prior to its publication by the OECD.

Keywords: MRF; Metabolomics; Metabolomics reporting framework; OECD; QA/QC; Regulatory; TRF; Toxicology; Transcriptomics; Transcriptomics reporting framework.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Modular structure of the omics reporting framework for transcriptomics and metabolomics.
Four principal types of modules are included: Study Summary Reporting Module (SSRM) describing a subset of reporting elements to provide a high level overview of the whole study; Toxicology Experiment Reporting Module (TERM) describing the in vivo or in vitro toxicology study; Data Acquisition and Processing Reporting Modules (DAPRM) describing the omics assays, data acquisition and processing; and Data Analysis Reporting Modules (DARM) describing the statistical analysis of the omics data. Orange modules are harmonized across transcriptomics and metabolomics, blue modules are specific to transcriptomics, and green modules are specific to metabolomics.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Approach to trialling the reporting framework.
The modules within the framework are currently being reviewed for clarity, completeness, utility and ease of use through six trials. Each trial comprises five phases, involving a data provider (initial analysis –red box), end user (re-analysis – blue box), a trialling coordinator (green boxes) and the TRF or MRF expert groups (purple box). For a module to be approved, it must enable an end user to reproduce the analysis of an omics dataset, relative to the initial analysis by the data provider.

References

    1. Alpern D, Gardeux V, Russeil J, Mangeat B, Meireles-Filho ACA, Breysse R, Hacker D, Deplancke B. 2019. Brb-seq: Ultra-affordable high-throughput transcriptomics enabled by bulk rna barcoding and sequencing. Genome Biol. 20(1):71. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, Sherlock G, Spellman P, Stoeckert C, Aach J, Ansorge W, Ball CA, Causton HC et al. 2001. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet. 29(4):365–371. - PubMed
    1. Brockmeier EK, Hodges G, Hutchinson TH, Butler E, Hecker M, Tollefsen KE, Garcia-Reyero N, Kille P, Becker D, Chipman K et al. 2017. The role of omics in the application of adverse outcome pathways for chemical risk assessment. Toxicol Sci. 158(2):252–262. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buesen R, Chorley BN, da Silva Lima B, Daston G, Deferme L, Ebbels T, Gant TW, Goetz A, Greally J, Gribaldo L et al. 2017. Applying ‘omics technologies in chemicals risk assessment: Report of an ECETOC workshop. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 91 Suppl 1:S3–S13. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Conesa A, Madrigal P, Tarazona S, Gomez-Cabrero D, Cervera A, McPherson A, Szczesniak MW, Gaffney DJ, Elo LL, Zhang X et al. 2016. A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis. Genome Biol. 17:13. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms