Risk-adjusted analysis of long-term outcomes after on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
- PMID: 34333605
- PMCID: PMC8632741
- DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivab179
Risk-adjusted analysis of long-term outcomes after on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting
Abstract
Objectives: Recent data suggested that off-pump coronary artery bypass (OPCAB) may carry a higher risk for mortality in the long term when compared to on-pump coronary artery bypass (ONCAB). We, therefore, compared long-term survival and morbidity in patients undergoing ONCAB versus OPCAB in a large single-centre cohort.
Methods: A total of 8981 patients undergoing isolated elective/urgent coronary artery bypass grafting between January 2009 and December 2019 were analysed. Patients were stratified into 2 groups (OPCAB n = 6649/ONCAB n = 2332). The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included repeat revascularization, stroke and myocardial infarction. To adjust for potential selection bias, 1:1 nearest neighbour propensity score (PS) matching was performed resulting in 1857 matched pairs. Moreover, sensitivity analysis was applied in the entire study cohort using multivariable- and PS-adjusted Cox regression analysis.
Results: In the PS-matched cohort, 10-year mortality was similar between study groups [OPCAB 36.4% vs ONCAB 35.8%: hazard ratio (HR) 0.99, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-1.12; P = 0.84]. While 10-year outcomes of secondary endpoints did not differ significantly, risk of stroke (OPCAB 1.50% vs ONCAB 2.8%: HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.83; P = 0.006) and mortality (OPCAB 3.1% vs ONCAB 4.8%: HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.47-0.91; P = 0.011) at 1 year was lower in the OPCAB group. In the multivariable- and the PS-adjusted model, mortality at 10 years was not significantly different (OPCAB 34.1% vs ONCAB 35.7%: HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87-1.08; P = 0.59 and HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90-1.13; P = 0.91, respectively).
Conclusions: Data do not provide evidence that elective/urgent OPCAB is associated with significantly higher risks of mortality, repeat revascularization, or myocardial infarction during late follow-up when compared to ONCAB. Patients undergoing OPCAB may benefit from reduced risks of stroke and mortality within the first year postoperatively.
Keywords: Coronary artery bypass grafting; Coronary artery disease; Myocardial revascularization; Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting; Off-pump surgery.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.J Surg Res. 2025 May;309:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2025.02.041. Epub 2025 Mar 27. J Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 40153915
-
Impact of multiple arterial grafts in off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Feb;153(2):300-309.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.10.084. Epub 2016 Nov 16. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017. PMID: 27955911
-
Long-term survival after off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Does completeness of revascularization play a role?Int J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;246:32-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.04.087. Epub 2017 May 9. Int J Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28499666
-
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies comparing off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in the elderly.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2022 Feb;63(1):60-68. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.21.12012-9. Epub 2021 Nov 18. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2022. PMID: 34792312
-
Off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery in patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis.Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018 Feb;22(1):99-109. doi: 10.1007/s10157-017-1432-7. Epub 2017 Jun 20. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2018. PMID: 28634771 Review.
Cited by
-
Serum Periostin as a Novel Biomarker for Predicting 30-Day Major Adverse Cardiac Events After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Feb 18;21:161-176. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S507435. eCollection 2025. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025. PMID: 39991461 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Smart NA, Dieberg G, King N.. Long-term outcomes of on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:983–91. - PubMed
-
- Kowalewski M, Pawliszak W, Malvindi PG, Bokszanski MP, Perlinski D, Raffa GM. et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes in high-risk patients compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;151:60–77.e1–58. - PubMed
-
- Kuss O, von Salviati B, Borgermann J.. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score analyses. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;140:829–35, 35.e1–13. - PubMed
-
- Polomsky M, He X, O’Brien SM, Puskas JD.. Outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: impact of preoperative risk. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;145:1193–8. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical