Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2021 Aug 2;49(7):797-805.
doi: 10.1515/jpm-2021-0157. Print 2021 Sep 27.

Cervical ripening after cesarean section: a prospective dual center study comparing a mechanical osmotic dilator vs. prostaglandin E2

Affiliations
Free article
Observational Study

Cervical ripening after cesarean section: a prospective dual center study comparing a mechanical osmotic dilator vs. prostaglandin E2

Josefine Theresia Koenigbauer et al. J Perinat Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: Worldwide, the overall cesarean section is rising. Trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC) is an overall safe option with an immediate impact on neonatal and maternal short- and long-term health. Since the use of prostaglandins in cervical ripening is associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture, mechanical methods as balloon catheters or osmotic dilators have been suggested for cervical ripening prior to induction of labour. Here we are analyzing and comparing the VBAC rate, as well as maternal and fetal outcome in cervical ripening prior to TOLAC.

Methods: This prospective dual center study analyses maternal and neonatal outcomes of TOLAC in women with an unfavorable cervix requiring cervical ripening agent. The prospective application of an osmotic dilator (Dilapan-S, n=104) was analysed in comparison to the retrospective application of off-label dinoprostone (n=102).

Results: The overall fetal and neonatal outcome revealed no significant differences in both groups. Patients receiving cervical ripening with the osmotic dilator delivered vaginally/by ventouse in 52% of cases, compared to 53% when using dinoprostone (p=0.603). The interval between application to onset of labor was significantly higher in the osmotic dilator group (37.9 vs.20.7 h, p=<0.001). However, time from onset of labor to delivery was similar in both groups (7.93 vs. 7.44 h, p=0.758). There was one case of uterine rupture in the dinoprostone group.

Conclusions: Our data shows that the application of the osmotic dilator leads to similar outcomes in VBAC rate and time from onset of labor to delivery as well as safety in both groups compared to off-label use dinoprostone. Cervical ripening using the mechanical dilator is a viable and effective option, without the risk of uterine hyperstimulation.

Keywords: cervical ripening; cesarean section (CS); cesarean section rate; osmotic dilator; repeat cesarean section (RCS); trial of labor after cesarean (TOLAC); unfavorable cervix; uterine scar; vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC).

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Federal Statistical Office Germany: hospital deliveries in Germany. 2020.
    1. Health at a Glance 2019. OECD; 2019: 200–1 pp.
    1. Marshall, NE, Fu, R, Guise, J-M. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011 Jun 15;205:262.e1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.035. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Gregory, K, Jackson, S, Korst, L, Fridman, M. Cesarean versus vaginal delivery: whose risks? Whose benefits? Am J Perinatol 2012 Aug 10;29:7–18. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1285829. [Epub ahead of print].
    1. Dodd, JM, Crowther, CA, Grivell, RM, Deussen, AR. Elective repeat caesarean section versus induction of labour for women with a previous caesarean birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;7. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd004906.pub5.

LinkOut - more resources