Peripheral Arterial Lines in Extremely Preterm Neonates: A Potential Alternative to Umbilical Arterial Catheters
- PMID: 34334679
- DOI: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000909
Peripheral Arterial Lines in Extremely Preterm Neonates: A Potential Alternative to Umbilical Arterial Catheters
Abstract
Background: Arterial catheterization is a routine procedure in extremely preterm neonates. Umbilical arterial catheters (UACs) are typically used for this purpose, but life-threatening complications have been described. Peripheral arterial lines (PALs) might offer a valuable alternative, but their feasibility in extremely preterm newborns is unclear.
Purpose: To investigate efficacy and complications of PALs in extremely preterm neonates.
Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients born below 26 weeks of gestation in 2011-2014 (cohort 1, UAC as primary arterial access) and 2015-2019 (cohort 2, PAL as primary arterial access). Arterial line placement during their first 14 days of life, duration of arterial access, reasons for discontinuation, and long-term complications were recorded from health records.
Results: In total, 161 of 202 newborns had an arterial line during their first 14 days of life. In cohort 2, the life span of a PAL was significantly longer than that in cohort 1. Signs of dysfunction were the primary reason to discontinue a PAL. Signs of peripheral ischemia were present in 36 of 105 cases (34%) when the PAL was removed but persisted in only 2 patients. UAC-associated persistent ischemic damage occurred in 2 of 97 patients.
Implications for practice and research: PALs are a valuable alternative to UACs even in preterm newborns below 26 weeks of gestational age. A special focus on ischemic complications is warranted. Prospective, multicenter studies to verify safety and efficacy of arterial line management and complications in extremely preterm infants are warranted.
Copyright © 2021 by The National Association of Neonatal Nurses.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
References
-
- Elboraee M, Toye J, Ye X, Shah P, Aziz K; Canadian Neonatal Network Investigators. Association between umbilical catheters and neonatal outcomes in extremely preterm infants. Am J Perinatol. 2018;35(3):233–241. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1606607.
-
- Hermansen MC, Goetz Hermansen M. Intravascular catheter complications in the neonatal intensive care unit. Clin Perinatol. 2005;32(1):141–156. doi:10.1016/j.clp.2004.11.005.
-
- Borenstein-Levin L, Hochwald O, Ben David S, Kugelman A. Abdominal aortic perforation by an umbilical arterial catheter. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2020;105(1):40. doi:10.1136/archdischild-2019-317869.
-
- Furdon SA, Horgan MJ, Bradshaw WT, Clark DA. Nurses' guide to early detection of umbilical arterial catheter complications in infants. Adv Neonatal Care. 2006;6(5):242–256. doi:10.1016/j.adnc.2006.06.001.
-
- Molanus D, Van Scherpenzeel M, Derikx J, Van Den Dungen F. Umbilical artery perforation: a potentially life-threatening complication of umbilical artery catheterisation. BMJ Case Rep. 2017;2017:bcr2017222664. doi:10.1136/bcr-2017-222664.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources