Systematic review of predictive mathematical models of COVID-19 epidemic
- PMID: 34334908
- PMCID: PMC8313025
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2021.05.005
Systematic review of predictive mathematical models of COVID-19 epidemic
Abstract
Background: Various mathematical models were published to predict the epidemiological consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic. This systematic review has studied the initial epidemiological models.
Methods: Articles published from January to June 2020 were extracted from databases using search strings and those peer-reviewed with full text in English were included in the study. They were analysed as to whether they made definite predictions in terms of time and numbers, or contained only mathematical assumptions and open-ended predictions. Factors such as early vs. late prediction models, long-term vs. curve-fitting models and comparisons based on modelling techniques were analysed in detail.
Results: Among 56,922 hits in 05 databases, screening yielded 434 abstracts, of which 72 articles were included. Predictive models comprised over 70% (51/72) of the articles, with susceptible, exposed, infectious and recovered (SEIR) being the commonest type (mean duration of prediction being 3 months). Common predictions were regarding cumulative cases (44/72, 61.1%), time to reach total numbers (41/72, 56.9%), peak numbers (22/72, 30.5%), time to peak (24/72, 33.3%), hospital utilisation (7/72, 9.7%) and effect of lockdown and NPIs (50/72, 69.4%). The commonest countries for which models were predicted were China followed by USA, South Korea, Japan and India. Models were published by various professionals including Engineers (12.5%), Mathematicians (9.7%), Epidemiologists (11.1%) and Physicians (9.7%) with a third (32.9%) being the result of collaborative efforts between two or more professions.
Conclusion: There was a wide diversity in the type of models, duration of prediction and the variable that they predicted, with SEIR model being the commonest type.
Keywords: COVID-19; Mathematical models; Nonpharmaceutical interventions; Systematic review.
© 2021 Director General, Armed Forces Medical Services. Published by Elsevier, a division of RELX India Pvt. Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Four of the authors have previously authored a mathematical model for the COVID epidemic.
Figures
References
-
- Bryne J. Live Science; 2020 Mar 14. 1st known case of coronavirus traced back to November in China. Editor-in-Chief.
-
- Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - events as they happen [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/events-a....
-
- Coronavirus Update (Live): 8,649,131 Cases and 458,122 Deaths from COVID-19 Virus Pandemic - Worldometer [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jun 19]. Available from: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/.
-
- Kermack W.O., McKendrick A.G., Walker G.T. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. Proc R Soc Lond - Ser A Contain Pap a Math Phys Character. 1927 Aug 1;115(772):700–721.
-
- Brainard J. Scientists are drowning in COVID-19 papers. Can new tools keep them afloat? Science. May. 13, 2020 https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/05/scientists-are-drowning-covid-19... [Internet] AAAS. 2020 [cited 2020 Jun 20]. Available from:
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
