Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021;28(4):609-621.
doi: 10.1080/10705511.2021.1878895. Epub 2021 Mar 23.

Effect of Parameterization on Statistical Power and Effect Size Estimation in Latent Growth Modeling

Affiliations

Effect of Parameterization on Statistical Power and Effect Size Estimation in Latent Growth Modeling

Alan Feingold. Struct Equ Modeling. 2021.

Abstract

The difference between groups in their random slopes is frequently examined in latent growth modeling to evaluate treatment efficacy. However, when end centering is used for model parameterization with a randomized design, the difference in the random intercepts is the model-estimated mean difference between the groups at the end of the study, which has the same expected value as the product of the coefficient for the slope difference and study duration. A Monte Carlo study found that (a) the statistical power to detect the treatment effect was greater when determined from the intercept instead of the slope difference, and (b) the standard error of the model-estimated mean difference was smaller when obtained from the intercept difference. Investigators may reduce Type II errors by comparing groups in random intercepts instead of random slopes to test treatment effects, and should therefore conduct power assessments using end centering to detect each difference.

Keywords: effect sizes; latent growth models; randomized controlled trials; statistical power.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agresti A (2002). Categorical data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
    1. Arend MG, & Schäfer T (2019). Statistical power in two-level models: A tutorial based on Monte Carlo simulation. Psychological Methods, 24, 1–19. 10.1037/met0000195 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baguley T (2009). Standardized or simple effect size: What should be reported? British Journal of Psychology, 100, 603–617. 10.1348/000712608X377117 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banjanovic ES, & Osborne JW (2016). Confidence intervals for effect sizes: Applying bootstrap resampling. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 21, 1–18.
    1. Benichou J, & Gail MH (1989). A delta method for implicitly defined random variables. The American Statistician, 43, 41–44.

LinkOut - more resources