Reliability of continuous glucose monitoring system in the inpatient setting
- PMID: 34336598
- PMCID: PMC8318984
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcte.2021.100262
Reliability of continuous glucose monitoring system in the inpatient setting
Abstract
Aims/hypothesis: Hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia are associated with increased morbidity and mortality in the inpatient setting. Standard point of care capillary glucose testing (POCT) is commonly used in hospitalized patients to monitor their glucose levels. The goal of this study was to examine the relationships between the glucose readings obtained by a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) (Freestyle Libre) and the capillary blood glucose results obtained by the inpatient glucose POCT meter (Accuchek Inform II) as well as between CGMS readings and the serum glucose values obtained by the hospital laboratory. Study participants had either primary or secondary diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and were admitted to non-critical units. We hypothesized that there exists an acceptable agreement between the capillary blood glucose results obtained by the inpatient glucose POCT meter (Accuchek Inform II) and the readings obtained by the CGMS (Freestyle Libre); and that there exists an acceptable agreement between the serum glucose levels and the glucose values obtained by the CGMS.
Methods: This was an Institutional Review Board approved prospective cohort study for the non- critical inpatient setting. Fifty-two hospitalized patients with diabetes were recruited. After informed consent was obtained, patients were instructed on the application and use of the CGMS. The data were assessed using a standard regression analysis and modified Bland Altman analysis. All analyses were conducted using SAS, release 3.8 Enterprise Edition (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
Results: Fifty-two subjects recruited into the study represented a sample of convenience. There were a total of 467 AccuChek-Libre pairs, The regression analysis showed a negative bias between.Libre and AccuChek, R2 = 0.83, with Libre glucose readings on average being lower than those of AccuChek. Using Bland-Altman analysis, 42% of the 467 Libre-AccuChek pairs had a difference in glucose reading more than 15%. Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between Libre and AccuChek was 15.6%; mean relative difference (MRD) between Libre and AccuChek was -11.4%.The regression analysis showed a negative bias between Libre and serum glucose, R2 = 0.89. Using Bland Altman analysis, 36% of the 44 Libre-serum pairs had a difference in glucose reading more than 15%. Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) between Libre and serum glucose was 13.2%; mean relative difference (MRD) between Libre and serum glucose was -12.5%.A review of the data pairs showed that 71/467 Accuchek-Libre pairs had one result that was either below 70 mg/dl or above 200 mg/dl (combined American Diabetes Association-ADA-, American College of Physicians-ACP- and American College of Endocrinology-AACE- goals). Thus 85%, of these pairs would have yielded results that engendered the same intervention (e.g. treatment for hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia). Likewise 5/45 Serum-Libre pairs had one result that was either below 70 mg/dl or above 200 mg/dl; thus 89% of these pairs would have yielded results requiring the same intervention.
Conclusion/interpretation: These findings confirm the existent literature and indicate acceptable agreement between the standard POCT and the CGMS as well as between serum glucose and the CGMS values. Because of the advantages of the CGMS over capillary blood glucose testing (reduced patient discomfort and reduced staff exposure to patients in isolation) CGMS use may be preferable to the current bedside capillary blood glucose testing in hospitalized patients with diabetes mellitus. As with other laboratory measures, clinical judgement needs to be exercised when the laboratory values are used to guide patient care.
Keywords: Continuous glucose monitor system; Diabetes; In-patient; Point of care.
© 2021 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Feasibility of intraoperative continuous glucose monitoring: An observational study in general surgery patients.J Clin Anesth. 2023 Aug;87:111090. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111090. Epub 2023 Mar 11. J Clin Anesth. 2023. PMID: 36913777
-
Reliability of Inpatient CGM: Comparison to Standard of Care.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Mar;17(2):329-335. doi: 10.1177/19322968211062168. Epub 2021 Dec 15. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023. PMID: 34911384 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of a novel calibratable real-time continuous glucose monitoring device based on FreeStyle libre in- and out-of-hospital.Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Apr 22;16:1466358. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1466358. eCollection 2025. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40331145 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of Freestyle Libre continuous glucose monitoring system in critically ill patients after cardiac surgery.J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Jan 20;20(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03229-1. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025. PMID: 39833920 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital.Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2021 Apr;36(2):240-255. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2021.201. Epub 2021 Mar 31. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2021. PMID: 33789033 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Continuous Glucose Monitoring vs. Capillary Blood Glucose in Hospitalized Type 2 Diabetes Patients.Cureus. 2023 Aug 21;15(8):e43832. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43832. eCollection 2023 Aug. Cureus. 2023. PMID: 37736430 Free PMC article.
-
A Consensus Statement for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics for Inpatient Clinical Trials.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023 Nov;17(6):1527-1552. doi: 10.1177/19322968231191104. Epub 2023 Aug 17. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2023. PMID: 37592726 Free PMC article.
-
The Devil Is in the Details: Use, Limitations, and Implementation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Inpatient Setting.Diabetes Spectr. 2022 Fall;35(4):405-419. doi: 10.2337/dsi22-0009. Epub 2022 Nov 15. Diabetes Spectr. 2022. PMID: 36561647 Free PMC article.
-
Telenursing as an Effective Ally for Improving Patient Outcomes in Diabetes? An Umbrella Review.Nurs Open. 2025 Jul;12(7):e70265. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70265. Nurs Open. 2025. PMID: 40607766 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cost-Effectiveness of Inpatient Continuous Glucose Monitoring.Cureus. 2024 Mar 12;16(3):e55999. doi: 10.7759/cureus.55999. eCollection 2024 Mar. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 38476508 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Haak T., Hanaire H., Ajjan R., Hermanns N., Riveline J.P., Rayman G. Flash Glucose-Sensing Technology as a Replacement for Blood Glucose Monitoring for the Management of Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: A Multicenter, Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes therapy: research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders. 2017;8(1):55–73. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Bolinder J., Antuna R., Geelhoed-Duijvestijn P., Kröger J., Weitgasser R. Novel glucose- sensing technology and hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes: A multicenter, non-masked, randomized controlled trial. The Lancet. 2016;388:2254–2263. - PubMed
-
- Wallia A., Umpierrez G.E., Rushakoff R.J., Klonoff D.C., Rubin D.J., Hill Golden S. Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Hospital Panel. Consensus Statement on Inpatient Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017;11(5):1036–1044. doi: 10.1177/1932296817706151. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials