Knowledge assessment and psychological impact of genetic counseling in people at risk for familial FTD
- PMID: 34337135
- PMCID: PMC8319661
- DOI: 10.1002/dad2.12225
Knowledge assessment and psychological impact of genetic counseling in people at risk for familial FTD
Abstract
Introduction: The decision to undergo genetic testing for familial frontotemporal dementia (fFTD) is challenging and complex. When counseling individuals, clinicians need to know what individuals understand about the type of fFTD for which they may be at elevated risk. Unfortunately, no tools to measure understanding of fFTD exist, and no study has investigated knowledge gain from fFTD genetic counseling.
Methods: Before and after genetic counseling, 42 asymptomatic individuals from fFTD families completed the newly developed fFTD Knowledge Assessment and Psychological Impact Questionnaire (fFTD KAPI-Q), along with affect and mood questionnaires.
Results: Genetic counseling resulted in substantial knowledge gain on the fFTD KAPI-Q (average gain = 40%); those with lower pre-counseling scores gained the most. Negative affect diminished by 11%. Individuals who gained the greatest knowledge demonstrated the greatest reduction in negative affect.
Conclusions: Genetic counseling was effective regardless of level of baseline knowledge and has an immediate ameliorative impact on negative affect.
Keywords: affect; familial FTD (fFTD); genetic counseling; knowledge assessment.
© 2021 The Authors. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.
Conflict of interest statement
B.C.D. receives research support from NIH, Alzheimer's Drug Discovery Foundation; has consulted for Acadia, Alector, Arkuda, Axovant, Biogen, Eisai, Life Molecular Sciences, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, and Wave LifeSciences; performs editorial duties with payment for Elsevier (Neuroimage: Clinical and Cortex); and receives royalties from Oxford University Press and Cambridge University Press. J.K. receives research support from Generation Program (Novartis), A4 Study (Lily Inc.), AHEAD Study (Esai), ENGAGE, EMERGE, & ADVANCE (Biogen), and NIH; receives royalties from UpToDate; received honoraria for a talk at McGill University; and receives payment for membership on board of the Greenwall Foundation. D.L. received travel support from departmental funds and NIH grant and was paid honoraria for lecturing at the Institute of Health Professionals and the College of the Holy Cross. The other authors report no declarations of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Hutton M, Lendon CL, Rizzu P, et al. Association of missense and 5'‐splice‐site mutations in tau with the inherited dementia FTDP‐17. Nature. 1998; 393(6686): 702‐705. - PubMed
-
- Poorkaj P, Bird TD, Wijsman E, et al. Tau is a candidate gene for chromosome 17 frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol. 1998; 43(6): 815‐825. - PubMed
-
- Rademakers R, Cruts M, Van Broeckhoven C. The role of tau (MAPT) in frontotemporal dementia and related tauopathies. Hum Mutat. 2004; 24(4): 277‐295. - PubMed
-
- Baker M, Mackenzie IR, Pickering‐Brown SM, et al. Mutations in progranulin cause tau‐negative frontotemporal dementia linked to chromosome 17. Nature. 2006; 442(7105): 916‐919. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources