Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 10:21:69-76.
doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2020.09.003. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Impact of Health-related Quality of Life and Prediagnosis Risk of Major Depressive Disorder on Treatment Choice in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer

Affiliations

Impact of Health-related Quality of Life and Prediagnosis Risk of Major Depressive Disorder on Treatment Choice in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer

Hannah Riskin-Jones et al. Eur Urol Open Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Treatment for low-risk (LR), favorable intermediate-risk (FIR), and unfavorable intermediate-risk (UIR) prostate cancer (PC) is complicated by clinical equipoise between multiple options. It is unknown how prediagnosis health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and major depressive disorder (MDD) risk impact treatment decisions.

Objective: To analyze associations of patient-reported HRQoL and MDD risk with treatment for LR, FIR, and UIR PC patients.

Design setting and participants: Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results and Medicare Health Outcomes Survey-linked database, we identified 1678 PC patients (498 with LR, 685 with FIR, and 495 with UIR) aged ≥65 yr and diagnosed between 2004 and 2015, who completed the health outcomes survey ≤24 mo before diagnosis.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: HRQoL was measured by physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summaries of the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) and Veterans RAND 12-item (VR-12) health survey instruments. MDD risk was derived from survey items screening for depressive symptoms. Associations with treatment choice were assessed by multivariable multinomial logistic regression.

Results and limitations: LR patients with higher PCS scores were more likely to receive radiation than surgery (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.5 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.1-2.1; p = 0.02]). FIR patients with MDD risk were more likely to receive neither treatment than surgery or radiation (surgery: AOR 2.6 [95% CI: 1.1-6.2; p = 0.03]; radiation: AOR 2.2 [95% CI: 1.2-4.2; p = 0.01]). UIR patients with MDD risk were more likely to undergo radiation than surgery (AOR 2.3 [95% CI: 1.0-4.9; p =0.04]). Additionally, higher PCS scores were associated with receipt of surgery compared with neither treatment (AOR 1.5 [95% CI: 1.1-2.0; p =0.01]). This study is limited by its retrospective design.

Conclusions: Older PC patients with MDD risk received less invasive treatments in the FIR and UIR groups. Higher PCS scores were associated with treatment modality in LR and UIR patients. HRQoL and MDD risk impact treatment choice, warranting additional study.

Patient summary: Treatment of prostate cancer requires thoughtful decision-making processes. This study shows that both pretreatment mental status and pretreatment physical status affect treatment decisions, and should be considered during counseling.

Keywords: Decision making; Depression; Health-related quality of life; Prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of treatment received by participants with low-risk, favorable intermediate-risk, and unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer among those at risk for major depressive disorder (MDD) versus those not at risk for MDD within 24 mo before diagnosis.

References

    1. Ferlay J., Ervik M., Lam F. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2018. Global Cancer Observatory: cancer today. https://gco.iarc.fr/today
    1. Fletcher S.A., von Landenberg N., Cole A.P. Contemporary national trends in prostate cancer risk profile at diagnosis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020;23:81–87. - PubMed
    1. Sanda M.G., Cadeddu J.A., Kirkby E. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline. Part I: risk stratification, shared decision making, and care options. J Urol. 2018;199:683–690. - PubMed
    1. Hoffman K.E., Niu J., Shen Y. Physician variation in management of low-risk prostate cancer: a population-based cohort study. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:1450–1459. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meeks T.W., Vahia I.V., Lavretsky H., Kulkarni G., Jeste D.V. A tune in “a minor” can “b major”: a review of epidemiology, illness course, and public health implications of subthreshold depression in older adults. J Affect Disord. 2011;129:126–142. - PMC - PubMed