Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb 24:26:55-63.
doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.01.011. eCollection 2021 Apr.

Comparative Survival Outcomes of High-risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy or Definitive Radiotherapy Regimens

Affiliations

Comparative Survival Outcomes of High-risk Prostate Cancer Treated with Radical Prostatectomy or Definitive Radiotherapy Regimens

Kirsti Aas et al. Eur Urol Open Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Observational data has indicated improved survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) compared with definitive radiotherapy (RT) in men with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

Objective: To compare PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall mortality (OM) in men with high-risk PCa treated with RP or RT, providing information on target doses and fractionations.

Design setting and participants: This is an observational study from the Cancer Registry of Norway. Patients were diagnosed with high-risk PCa during 2006-2015, treated with RP ≤12 mo or RT ≤15 mo after diagnosis, and stratified according to RP or RT modality; external beam radiotherapy (EBRT; 70-<74, 74-<78, or 78 Gy), hypofractionated RT or EBRT combined with brachytherapy (BT-RT).

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Competing risk and Kaplan-Meier methods estimated PCSM and OM, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression models evaluated hazard ratios (HRs) for PCSM and OM.

Results and limitations: In total, 9254 patients were included (RP 47%, RT 53%). RT patients were older, had poorer performance status and more unfavorable disease characteristics. With a median follow-up time of seven and eight yrs, the overall 10-yr PCSM was 7.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.4-8.0) and OM was 22.9% (95% CI 21.8-24.1). Compared with RP, EBRT 70-<74 Gy was associated with increased (HR 1.88, 95% CI 1.33-2.65, p < 0.001) and BT-RT with decreased (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.24-0.96, p = 0.039) 10-yr PCSM. Patients treated with EBRT 70-78 Gy had higher adjusted 10-yr OM than those treated with RP.

Conclusions: In men with high-risk PCa, treatment with EBRT <74 Gy was associated with increased adjusted 10-yr PCSM and OM, and BT-RT with decreased 10-yr PCSM, compared with RP.

Patient summary: In this study, we compared mortality after radical prostatectomy (RP) and radiotherapy (RT) in men with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa); the results suggest that men receiving lower-dose RT have higher, and patients receiving brachytherapy may have lower, risk of death from PCa than patients treated with prostatectomy.

Keywords: High risk; Mortality; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Radiotherapy; Treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prostate cancer–specific mortality according to treatment modality in men with high-risk prostate cancer. BT-RT = external beam radiotherapy combined with brachytherapy; EBRT = external beam radiotherapy; HYPO-RT = hypofractionated radiotherapy; PCa = prostate cancer; RP = radical prostatectomy.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overall mortality according to treatment modality in men with high-risk prostate cancer. BT-RT = external beam radiotherapy combined with brachytherapy; EBRT = external beam radiotherapy; HYPO-RT = hypofractionated radiotherapy; RP = radical prostatectomy.
None

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fossa S.D., Wiklund F., Klepp O. Ten- and 15-yr prostate cancer-specific mortality in patients with nonmetastatic locally advanced or aggressive intermediate prostate cancer, randomized to lifelong endocrine treatment alone or combined with radiotherapy: final results of the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-7. Eur Urol. 2016;70:684–691. - PubMed
    1. Mottet N., Bellmunt J., Bolla M. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent. Eur Urol. 2017;71:618–629. - PubMed
    1. Moris L., Cumberbatch M.G., Van den Broeck T. Benefits and risks of primary treatments for high-risk localized and locally advanced prostate cancer: an international multidisciplinary systematic review. Eur Urol. 2020;77:614–627. - PubMed
    1. Sooriakumaran P., Nyberg T., Akre O. Comparative effectiveness of radical prostatectomy and radiotherapy in prostate cancer: observational study of mortality outcomes. BMJ. 2014;348:g1502. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wallis C.J.D., Saskin R., Choo R. Surgery versus radiotherapy for clinically-localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2016;70:21–30. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources