Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 May 6:28:52-61.
doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.04.005. eCollection 2021 Jun.

Estetrol Cotreatment of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Infiltrating or Metastatic, Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase II Trial (PCombi)

Affiliations

Estetrol Cotreatment of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in Infiltrating or Metastatic, Castration-sensitive Prostate Cancer: A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase II Trial (PCombi)

Herjan J T Coelingh Bennink et al. Eur Urol Open Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists can be improved.

Objective: To assess safety, the frequency and severity of hot flushes (HFs), bone health, and antitumor effects of high-dose estetrol (HDE4) when combined with ADT.

Design setting and participants: A phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in advanced prostate cancer patients requiring ADT (the PCombi study).

Intervention: Patients receiving LHRH agonist treatment were randomized 2:1 to 40 mg HDE4 (n = 41) or placebo (n = 21) cotreatment for 24 wk.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Coprimary endpoints were frequency/severity of HFs and levels of total and free testosterone (T). Secondary endpoints included assessments of bone metabolism (osteocalcin and type I collagen telopeptide [CTX1]), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Efficacy analysis was based on the selected per-protocol (PP) population.

Results and limitations: Of 62 patients included in the study, 57 were suitable for a PP analysis (37 HDE4; 20 placebo). No E4-related serious cardiovascular adverse events occurred at 24 wk. Weekly HFs were reported by 13.5% of patients with HDE4 and 60.0% with placebo (p < 0.001). Daily HFs occurred in 5.9% versus 55%. Bone turnover parameters decreased significantly with HDE4 (p < 0.0001). Total and free T decreased earlier (p < 0.05), and free T was suppressed further (p < 0.05). PSA suppression was more profound and earlier (p < 0.005). FSH levels were suppressed by 98% versus 57% (p < 0.0001). Estrogenic side effects were nipple sensitivity (34%) and gynecomastia (17%).

Conclusions: HDE4 cotreatment of ADT patients with advanced prostate cancer was well tolerated, and no treatment-related cardiovascular adverse events were observed at 24 wk. HFs and bone turnover were substantially reduced. Suppression of free T, PSA, and FSH was more rapid and profound, suggesting enhanced disease control by HDE4 cotreatment. Larger and longer-lasting studies are needed to confirm the results of the study reported here.

Patient summary: Cotreatment of androgen deprivation therapy with high-dose estetrol in advanced prostate cancer patients results in fewer occurrences of hot flushes, bone protection, and other antitumor benefits. Nipple sensitivity and gynecomastia may occur as side effects.

Keywords: Androgen deprivation therapy; Antitumor efficacy; Bone; Cardiovascular safety; Estetrol; Hot flushes; Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists; PCombi; Prostate cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(A) Mean daily hot flushes and (B) percentage of patients experiencing at least one hot flush measured during treatment weeks 5, 13, and 23 with 40 mg estetrol (E4) or placebo in patients with prostate cancer treated with an LHRH agonist (per-protocol population). Mean daily hot flush score is a calculated score based on the number and severity of hot flushes per day, averaged over the 1-wk period. Severity was recorded as mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), and very severe (4). LHRH = luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Median levels of (A) total testosterone, (B) free testosterone, and (C) prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 18, and 24 wk of treatment with 40 mg estetrol (E4) or placebo in patients with prostate cancer treated with an LHRH agonist (per-protocol population). LHRH = luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone; T = testosterone.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean levels of (A) LH, (B) FSH, (C) E2, (D) SHBG, (E) DHEA-S, and markers of bone turnover—(F) osteocalcin and (G) CTX1—after 12 and 24 wk of treatment with 40 mg estetrol (E4) or placebo in patients with prostate cancer treated with an LHRH agonist (per-protocol population). CTX1 = type I collagen telopeptide; DHEA-S = dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate; E2 = estradiol; E4 = estetrol; FSH = follicle-stimulating hormone; LH = luteinizing hormone; SHBG = sex hormone–binding globulin.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Huggins C., Hodges C.V. Studies on prostatic cancer. I. The effect of castration, of estrogen and of androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Cancer Res. 1941;1:293–297. - PubMed
    1. Presti J.C., Jr Estrogen therapy for prostate carcinoma. JAMA. 1996;275:1153. - PubMed
    1. Turo R., Smolski M., Esler R. Diethylstilboestrol for the treatment of prostate cancer: past, present and future. Scand J Urol. 2014;48:4–14. - PubMed
    1. Matsuo H., Baba Y., Nair R.M., Arimura A., Schally A.V. Structure of the porcine LH- and FSH-releasing hormone. I. The proposed amino acid sequence. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1971;43:1334–1339. - PubMed
    1. Coelingh Bennink H.J.T., Zimmerman Y., Verhoeven C. A dose-escalating study with the fetal estrogen estetrol in healthy men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2018;103:3239–3249. - PubMed