Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;24(11):2339-2349.
doi: 10.1111/ele.13855. Epub 2021 Aug 1.

Quantifying the energetic cost of food quality constraints on resting metabolism to integrate nutritional and metabolic ecology

Affiliations

Quantifying the energetic cost of food quality constraints on resting metabolism to integrate nutritional and metabolic ecology

Thomas Ruiz et al. Ecol Lett. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Consumer metabolism controls the energy uptake from the environment and its allocation to biomass production. In natural ecosystems, available energy in food often fails to predict biomass production which is also (co)limited by the relative availability of various dietary compounds. To date, the link between energy metabolism and the effects of food chemical composition on biomass production remains elusive. Here, we measured the resting metabolic rate (RMR) of Daphnia magna along ontogeny when undergoing various (non-energetic) nutritional constraints. All types of dietary (co)limitations (Fatty acids, Sterols, Phosphorus) induced an increase in mass-specific RMR up to 128% between highest and lowest quality diets. We highlight a strong negative correlation between RMR and growth rate indicating RMR as a promising predictor of consumer growth rate. We argue that quantifying the energetic cost imposed by food quality on individual RMR may constitute a common currency enabling the integration of nutritional and metabolic ecology.

Keywords: Daphnia; fatty acids; metabolic ecology; nutrition; secondary production; sterols; stoichiometry.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Allen, A.P. & Gillooly, J.F. (2009) Towards an integration of ecological stoichiometry and the metabolic theory of ecology to better understand nutrient cycling. Ecology Letters, 12, 369-384.
    1. Auer, S.K., Salin, K., Rudolf, A.M., Anderson, G.J. & Metcalfe, N.B. (2015) Flexibility in metabolic rate confers a growth advantage under changing food availability. Journal of Animal Ecology, 84, 1405-1411.
    1. Barnes, A.D., Jochum, M., Lefcheck, J.S., Eisenhauer, N., Scherber, C., O’Connor, M.I. et al. (2018) Energy flux: The link between multitrophic biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 33, 186-197.
    1. Bec, A., Martin-Creuzburg, D. & von Elert, E. (2006) Trophic upgrading of autotrophic picoplankton by the heterotrophic nanoflagellate Paraphysomonas sp. Limnology and Oceanography, 51, 1699-1707.
    1. Boersma, M. (2000) The nutritional quality of P-limited algae for Daphnia. Limnology and Oceanography, 45, 1157-1161.

LinkOut - more resources