Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Sep 18;28(10):2287-2297.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab143.

A systematic review of automatic text summarization for biomedical literature and EHRs

Mengqian Wang  1 , Manhua Wang  2 , Fei Yu  2   3 , Yue Yang  1 , Jennifer Walker  3 , Javed Mostafa  1   2   4
Affiliations

A systematic review of automatic text summarization for biomedical literature and EHRs

Mengqian Wang et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: Biomedical text summarization helps biomedical information seekers avoid information overload by reducing the length of a document while preserving the contents' essence. Our systematic review investigates the most recent biomedical text summarization researches on biomedical literature and electronic health records by analyzing their techniques, areas of application, and evaluation methods. We identify gaps and propose potential directions for future research.

Materials and methods: This review followed the PRISMA methodology and replicated the approaches adopted by the previous systematic review published on the same topic. We searched 4 databases (PubMed, ACM Digital Library, Scopus, and Web of Science) from January 1, 2013 to April 8, 2021. Two reviewers independently screened title, abstract, and full-text for all retrieved articles. The conflicts were resolved by the third reviewer. The data extraction of the included articles was in 5 dimensions: input, purpose, output, method, and evaluation.

Results: Fifty-eight out of 7235 retrieved articles met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-nine systems used single-document biomedical research literature as their input, 17 systems were explicitly designed for clinical support, 47 systems generated extractive summaries, and 53 systems adopted hybrid methods combining computational linguistics, machine learning, and statistical approaches. As for the assessment, 51 studies conducted an intrinsic evaluation using predefined metrics.

Discussion and conclusion: This study found that current biomedical text summarization systems have achieved good performance using hybrid methods. Studies on electronic health records summarization have been increasing compared to a previous survey. However, the majority of the works still focus on summarizing literature.

Keywords: automatic text summarization; biomedical and health sciences literature; computational linguistics; electronic health records; machine learning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA diagram of the screening process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Stead WW, Lin HS, eds. Computational Technology for Effective Health Care: Immediate Steps and Strategic Directions. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009. - PubMed
    1. Christensen T, Grimsmo A.. Instant availability of patient records, but diminished availability of patient information: a multi-method study of GP’s use of electronic patient records. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008; 8 (1): 12–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McDonald CJ.Protocol-based computer reminders, the quality of care and the non-perfectibility of man. N Engl J Med 1976; 295 (24): 1351–5. - PubMed
    1. McDonald CJ, Callaghan FM, Weissman A, et al.Use of internist’s free time by ambulatory care electronic medical record systems. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174 (11): 1860–3. - PubMed
    1. Karsh BT, Holden RJ, Alper SJ, et al.A human factors engineering paradigm for patient safety: designing to support the performance of the healthcare professional. Qual Saf Health Care 2006; 15 (SUPPL 1): i59–65. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types