Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Dec;102(12):2353-2361.
doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.05.021. Epub 2021 Jul 30.

Limitations of Current Rehabilitation Practices in Pediatric Oncology: Implications for Improving Comprehensive Clinical Care

Molly J Houdeshell  1 , Kristin M Thomas  2 , Allison A King  3 , Allison J L'Hotta  4
Affiliations

Limitations of Current Rehabilitation Practices in Pediatric Oncology: Implications for Improving Comprehensive Clinical Care

Molly J Houdeshell et al. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Dec.

Abstract

Objective: To identify the proportion of hospitals/clinics in the United States (US) that have a comprehensive pediatric oncology rehabilitation program and characterize current practices.

Design: Cross-sectional survey of rehabilitation providers in the US and internationally.

Setting: Electronic or telephone survey.

Participants: Rehabilitation or supportive care practitioners employed at a hospital, outpatient clinic, or medical university (N=231).

Interventions: Electronic and telephone survey. The full electronic survey contained 39 questions, provided opportunities for open-ended responses, and covered 3 main categories specific to pediatric cancer rehabilitation: service delivery, rehabilitation program practices, and education/training. The short telephone survey included 4 questions from the full survey and was designed to answer the primary study objective.

Main outcome measures: Proportion of hospitals/clinics with a comprehensive pediatric oncology rehabilitation program.

Results: This cohort includes rehabilitation providers from 191 hospitals/clinics, 49 states within the US, and 5 countries outside of the US. Of hospitals/clinics represented from the full and short survey, 145 (76%) do not have an established pediatric oncology rehabilitation program. Nearly half of full survey respondents reported no knowledge of the prospective surveillance model, and 65% reported no education was provided to them regarding pediatric cancer rehabilitation. Qualitative survey responses fell into 3 major themes: variability in approach to rehabilitation service delivery, program gaps, and need for additional educational opportunities.

Conclusions: There is evidence of limited comprehensive rehabilitation programming for children with cancer as demonstrated by the lack of programs with coordinated interdisciplinary care, variability in long-term follow-up, and absence of education and training. Research is needed to support the development and implementation of comprehensive pediatric oncology rehabilitation programs.

Keywords: Cancer survivors; Health services; Pediatrics; Rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer