Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 2;18(1):164.
doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01214-8.

Queering reproductive access: reproductive justice in assisted reproductive technologies

Affiliations

Queering reproductive access: reproductive justice in assisted reproductive technologies

Michelle W Tam. Reprod Health. .

Abstract

Background: Advancements in assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and policy development have enabled more people to have biologically related children in Canada. However, as ART continues to focus on infertility and low fertility of heterosexual couples, ART access and research has been uneven towards meeting the reproductive needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, two-spirit, intersex, and asexual (LGBTQ2SIA +) people. Furthermore, experiences of reproduction are impacted by intersectional lived realities of race, gender, sexuality, and class. This commentary utilizes a reproductive justice (RJ) framework to consider reproductive access for LGBTQ2SIA + Black, Indigenous, and people of colour (BIPOC), while simultaneously engaging through a critical lens RJ has on ART. An RJ framework considers the constitutive elements of reproductive capacity and decision making that are not often at the forefront of reproductive health discussions. Additionally, this commentary discusses reproductive rights violations and reproductive violence such as coerced and forced sterilizations that have and are currently occurring in Canada. This article considers systems of access and structures of regulation that seek to control the reproductive capacities of marginalized communities, while empowering accessibility and upholding white supremacy and heteronormativity. In thinking through research and access in ART, who are ART users and whose reproduction is centered in research and access in Canada?

Conclusion: A reproductive justice framework is urgently needed to address inequities of sexual and reproductive health access in Canada.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Canadian Fertility and Andrology Society. Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) in Canada: 2015 results from the Canadian ART Register (CARTR) 2016. https://cfas.ca/canadian-art-register.html. Accessed 2 Jun 2021.
    1. Bushnik T, Cook JL, Yuzpe AA, Tough S, Collins J. Estimating the prevalence of infertility in Canada. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(3):738–746. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mamo L. Queering the fertility clinic. J Med Hum. 2013;34(2):227–239. - PubMed
    1. Mamo L, Alston-Stepnitz E. Queer intimacies and structural inequalities: new directions in stratified reproduction. J Fam Issues. 2015;36(4):519–540.
    1. Ross LE, Tarasoff LA, Anderson S, Epstein R, Marvel S, Steele LS. Sexual and gender minority peoples’ recommendations for assisted human reproduction services. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2014;36(2):146–153. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources