Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan;29(1):1073-1086.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15702-8. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

Impact of climate change on biodiversity loss: global evidence

Affiliations

Impact of climate change on biodiversity loss: global evidence

Muzafar Shah Habibullah et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

The present study investigates the impact of climate change on biodiversity loss using global data consisting of 115 countries. In this study, we measure biodiversity loss using data on the total number of threatened species of amphibians, birds, fishes, mammals, mollusks, plants, and reptiles. The data were compiled from the Red List published by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). For climate change variables, we have included temperature, precipitation, and the number of natural disaster occurrences. As for the control variable, we have considered governance indicator and the level of economic development. By employing ordinary least square with robust standard error and robust regression (M-estimation), our results suggest that all three climate change variables - temperature, precipitation, and the number of natural disasters occurrences - increase biodiversity loss. Higher economic development also impacted biodiversity loss positively. On the other hand, good governance such as the control of corruption, regulatory quality, and rule of law reduces biodiversity loss. Thus, practicing good governance, promoting conservation of the environment, and the control of greenhouse gasses would able to mitigate biodiversity loss.

Keywords: Biodiversity loss; Climate change; Global evidence; Governance; Threatened species.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

  • A standard approach for including climate change responses in IUCN Red List assessments.
    Mancini G, Santini L, Cazalis V, Akçakaya HR, Lucas PM, Brooks TM, Foden W, Di Marco M. Mancini G, et al. Conserv Biol. 2024 Jun;38(3):e14227. doi: 10.1111/cobi.14227. Epub 2024 Feb 2. Conserv Biol. 2024. PMID: 38111977
  • Patterns and biases of climate change threats in the IUCN Red List.
    Trull N, Böhm M, Carr J. Trull N, et al. Conserv Biol. 2018 Feb;32(1):135-147. doi: 10.1111/cobi.13022. Epub 2017 Oct 12. Conserv Biol. 2018. PMID: 28861903
  • Future climate change increase species vulnerability and present new opportunities for biodiversity conservation in China.
    Dong X, Gong J, Zhang W, Zhang S, Yang G, Yan C, Wang R, Zhang S, Wang T, Yu Y, Xie Q. Dong X, et al. J Environ Manage. 2025 Jun;385:125652. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125652. Epub 2025 May 6. J Environ Manage. 2025. PMID: 40334409
  • Madagascar's extraordinary biodiversity: Threats and opportunities.
    Ralimanana H, Perrigo AL, Smith RJ, Borrell JS, Faurby S, Rajaonah MT, Randriamboavonjy T, Vorontsova MS, Cooke RSC, Phelps LN, Sayol F, Andela N, Andermann T, Andriamanohera AM, Andriambololonera S, Bachman SP, Bacon CD, Baker WJ, Belluardo F, Birkinshaw C, Cable S, Canales NA, Carrillo JD, Clegg R, Clubbe C, Crottini A, Damasco G, Dhanda S, Edler D, Farooq H, de Lima Ferreira P, Fisher BL, Forest F, Gardiner LM, Goodman SM, Grace OM, Guedes TB, Hackel J, Henniges MC, Hill R, Lehmann CER, Lowry PP 2nd, Marline L, Matos-Maraví P, Moat J, Neves B, Nogueira MGC, Onstein RE, Papadopulos AST, Perez-Escobar OA, Phillipson PB, Pironon S, Przelomska NAS, Rabarimanarivo M, Rabehevitra D, Raharimampionona J, Rajaonary F, Rajaovelona LR, Rakotoarinivo M, Rakotoarisoa AA, Rakotoarisoa SE, Rakotomalala HN, Rakotonasolo F, Ralaiveloarisoa BA, Ramirez-Herranz M, Randriamamonjy JEN, Randrianasolo V, Rasolohery A, Ratsifandrihamanana AN, Ravololomanana N, Razafiniary V, Razanajatovo H, Razanatsoa E, Rivers M, Silvestro D, Testo W, Torres Jiménez MF, Walker K, Walker BE, Wilkin P, Williams J, Ziegler T, Zizka A, Antonelli A. Ralimanana H, et al. Science. 2022 Dec 2;378(6623):eadf1466. doi: 10.1126/science.adf1466. Epub 2022 Dec 2. Science. 2022. PMID: 36454830 Review.
  • Climate change and invasive species: double jeopardy.
    Mainka SA, Howard GW. Mainka SA, et al. Integr Zool. 2010 Jun;5(2):102-111. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4877.2010.00193.x. Integr Zool. 2010. PMID: 21392328 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Adler PB, Leiker J, Levine JM (2009) Direct and indirect effects of climate change on a Prairie plant community. PLoS One 4(9):e6887. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0006887 - DOI
    1. Amano T, Szekely T, Sandel B, Nagy S, Mundkur T, Langendoen T, Blanco D, Soykan CU, Sutherland WJ (2018) Successful conservation of global waterbird populations depends on effective governance. Nature 553:199–202. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25139 - DOI
    1. Asafu-Adjaye J (2003) Biodiversity loss and economic growth: a cross-country analysis. Contemp Econ Anal 21(2):173–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/cep/byg003 - DOI
    1. Barnett V, Lewis T (1994) Outliers in statistical data. New York: Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Outliers+in+Statistical+Data%2C+3rd+Edition-...
    1. Barrett CB, Gibson CC, Hoffman B, McCubbins MD (2006) The complex links between governance and biodiversity. Conserv Biol 20(5):1358–1366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00521.x - DOI

LinkOut - more resources