Factor Structure for the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool Symptom Scale in Adolescents After Concussion
- PMID: 34342297
- DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000959
Factor Structure for the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool Symptom Scale in Adolescents After Concussion
Abstract
Objective: To examine the factor structure of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool-5 (SCAT5) symptom scale in adolescents on their initial presentation to a concussion clinic within the typical recovery period after concussion (ie, <30 days). We hypothesize that the SCAT5 symptoms represent various clinically meaningful groups. A secondary purpose was to examine the effects of sex on the factor structure of the SCAT5 symptom scale.
Study design: Retrospective cross-sectional analysis.
Setting: Tertiary, institutional.
Patients: Nine hundred eighty-one adolescents (45% women) aged between 13 and 18 years.
Independent variables: Adolescents completed the SCAT5 symptom scale.
Main outcome measures: The factor structure of SCAT5 examined using a principal axis factor analysis.
Results: A 5-factor structure model explained 61% of the variance in symptoms. These 5 factors are identified as Energy (17%), Mental Health (13%), Migrainous (13%), Cognitive (9%), and Vestibulo-Ocular (9%). A similar 5-factor model emerged for each sex, and the proportion of variance in symptoms explained by the 5-factor model was comparable between the sexes.
Conclusions: The findings of this report indicate that the SCAT5 symptoms aggregated into 5 delineated factors, and these factors were largely consistent across the sexes. The delineation of symptoms into 5 factors provides preliminary validation for the presence of different concussion phenotypes. Confirmatory factor analysis is warranted to examine the applicability and clinical utility of the use of the 5-factor structure in a clinical setting.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- CDC. Report to Congress on Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States: Epidemiology and Rehabilitation. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention; 2015.
-
- DePadilla L, Miller G, Jones SE, et al. Self-reported concussions from playing a sport or being physically active among high school students—United States, 2017. MMWR. 2018;67:682–685.
-
- Davis GA, Anderson V, Babl FE, et al. What is the difference in concussion management in children as compared with adults? A systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51:949–957.
-
- Zemek RL, Farion KJ, Sampson M, et al. Prognosticators of persistent symptoms following pediatric concussion: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatr. 2013;167:259–265.
-
- Iverson GL, Gardner AJ, Terry DP, et al. Predictors of clinical recovery from concussion: a systematic review. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51:941–948.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
