Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 1;50(3):389-397.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005264.

Should We Prolong the Observation Period for Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest?

Min-Shan Tsai  1 , Wen-Jone Chen  1   2 , Wei-Ting Chen  1 , Yu-Tzu Tien  1 , Wei-Tien Chang  1 , Hooi-Nee Ong  1 , Chien-Hua Huang  1
Affiliations

Should We Prolong the Observation Period for Neurological Recovery After Cardiac Arrest?

Min-Shan Tsai et al. Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate whether the recommended observation period of 7 days for cardiac arrest survivors is sufficient for conscious recovery and to identify the variables associated with eventual neurologic recovery among patients with delayed awakening.

Design: A retrospective cohort study.

Setting: A single tertiary medical center.

Patients: Five-hundred twenty-nine nontraumatic adult cardiac arrest survivors with prearrest favorable neurologic function (Cerebral Performance Category 1-2) who survived to hospital discharge during 2011-2019.

Interventions: The enrolled patients were classified into favorable (Cerebral Performance Category 1-2) and poor (Cerebral Performance Category 3-4) neurologic recovery according to their neurologic function at hospital discharge. Among patients with favorable neurologic recovery, those who recovered within 7 days were assigned to the early recovery group or after 7 days as the late recovery group.

Measurements and main results: There were 395 patients exhibiting favorable neurologic recovery (n = 357 in the early group, n = 38 in late group) and 134 patients exhibiting poor neurologic recovery (poor recovery group). Among patients who remained unconscious on day 7, delayed awakening was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR], 3.905; 95% CI, 1.153-13.221), prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (OR, 7.628; 95% CI, 2.084-27.922), therapeutic hypothermia (OR, 4.320; 95% CI, 1.624-11.488), and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR, 4.508; 95% CI, 1.414-14.371). Being transferred from another hospital, however, was less likely to be associated with delayed awakening (OR, 0.061; 95% CI, 0.009-0.431). The median duration for patients to regain clear consciousness in the late recovery group was 12.12 days. No patient who recovered consciousness had an unfavorable electroencephalography pattern, however, in patients with poor recovery, the 7-day electroencephalography showed 45 patients with generalized suppression (33.6%), two with burst suppression (1.5%), 14 with seizure/epileptic discharge (10.5%), and one with status epilepticus (0.7%).

Conclusions: Up to 9.6% of cardiac arrest patients with favorable outcomes recover consciousness after the recommended 7 days of observation, indicating the observation time of 7 days seems justified but longer duration may be needed. The results of the culturally and clinically isolated population may limit the application to other population.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of patient enrollment. CPR = cardiopulmonary resuscitation, ED = emergency department, ROSC = return of spontaneous circulation.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
The distribution of patients who regained clear consciousness per day. HT = hypothermia, nonHT = nonhypothermia.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Lemiale V, Dumas F, Mongardon N, et al. : Intensive care unit mortality after cardiac arrest: The relative contribution of shock and brain injury in a large cohort. Intensive Care Med. 2013; 39:1972–1980 - PubMed
    1. Dragancea I, Rundgren M, Englund E, et al. : The influence of induced hypothermia and delayed prognostication on the mode of death after cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2013; 84:337–342 - PubMed
    1. Nielsen N, Wetterslev J, Cronberg T, et al. ; TTM Trial Investigators: Targeted temperature management at 33°C versus 36°C after cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369:2197–2206 - PubMed
    1. Mulder M, Gibbs HG, Smith SW, et al. : Awakening and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in cardiac arrest survivors treated with therapeutic hypothermia*. Crit Care Med. 2014; 42:2493–2499 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amorim E, Ghassemi MM, Lee JW, et al. : Estimating the false positive rate of absent somatosensory evoked potentials in cardiac arrest prognostication. Crit Care Med. 2018; 46:e1213–e1221 - PMC - PubMed