Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Mar;32(3):1579-1589.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08179-z. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

Dedicated breast CT: state of the art-Part I. Historical evolution and technical aspects

Affiliations
Review

Dedicated breast CT: state of the art-Part I. Historical evolution and technical aspects

Yueqiang Zhu et al. Eur Radiol. 2022 Mar.

Erratum in

Abstract

Dedicated breast CT is an emerging 3D isotropic imaging technology for breast, which overcomes the limitations of 2D compression mammography and limited angle tomosynthesis while providing some of the advantages of magnetic resonance imaging. This first installment in a 2-part review describes the evolution of dedicated breast CT beginning with a historical perspective and progressing to the present day. Moreover, it provides an overview of state-of-the-art technology. Particular emphasis is placed on technical limitations in scan protocol, radiation dose, breast coverage, patient comfort, and image artifact. Proposed methods of how to address these technical challenges are also discussed. KEY POINTS: • Advantages of breast CT include no tissue overlap, improved patient comfort, rapid acquisition, and concurrent assessment of microcalcifications and contrast enhancement. • Current clinical and prototype dedicated breast CT systems differ in acquisition modes, imaging techniques, and detector types. • There are still details to be decided regarding breast CT techniques, such as scan protocol, radiation dose, breast coverage, patient comfort, and image artifact.

Keywords: Artifacts; Breast; Cone-beam computed tomography; History; Radiation dosage.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2020) Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin 70:7–30 - PubMed
    1. Bleyer A, Welch HG (2012) Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med 367:1998–2005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen Z, Ning R (2003) Why should breast tumour detection go three dimensional? Phys Med Biol 48:2217–2228 - PubMed
    1. D’Orsi CJ, Getty DJ, Pickett RM et al (2013) Stereoscopic digital mammography: improved specificity and reduced rate of recall in a prospective clinical trial. Radiology 266:81–88 - PubMed
    1. Alabousi M, Zha N, Salameh JP et al (2020) Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 30:2058–2071 - PubMed