Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 3;43(3):93.
doi: 10.1007/s40656-021-00447-x.

Aging 4.0? Rethinking the ethical framing of technology-assisted eldercare

Affiliations

Aging 4.0? Rethinking the ethical framing of technology-assisted eldercare

Silke Schicktanz et al. Hist Philos Life Sci. .

Abstract

Technological approaches are increasingly discussed as a solution for the provision of support in activities of daily living as well as in medical and nursing care for older people. The development and implementation of such assistive technologies for eldercare raise manifold ethical, legal, and social questions. The discussion of these questions is influenced by theoretical perspectives and approaches from medical and nursing ethics, especially the principlist framework of autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. Tying in with previous criticism, the present contribution is taking these principles as a starting point and as a frame of reference to be critically re-examined. It thus aims to outline how existing ethical frameworks need to be extended or reconsidered to capture the ethical issues posed by technological developments regarding care for older people. In a first step, we provide a brief overview of assistive technologies in eldercare according to their purposes and functions. In the next step, we discuss how the questions and problems raised by new technologies in eldercare call for an expansion, re-interpretation, and revision of the principlist framework. We underline that the inclusion of ethical perspectives from engineering and computer science as well as a closer consideration of socio-political dimensions and fundamental anthropological and praxeological questions are needed.

Keywords: Aging; Empowerment; Ethics; Justice; Liability; Privacy; Technology assisted care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Ammicht Quinn R, Beimborn M, Kadi S, Köberer N, Mühleck M, Spindler M, Tulatz K. Alter Ein Fragen- und Kriterienkatalog. Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen; 2015.
    1. Anderson, M., & Anderson, S. L. (2008). ETHEL: Toward a principled ethical eldercare robot. In AAAI fall symposium: AI in eldercare: New solutions to old problems. Retrieved June 10, 2020, from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7189/e81875aff100a74aa288ea761e52843371....
    1. Arnold, D. G. (Ed.) (2009). Ethics and the business of biomedicine. Cambridge University Press.
    1. Aujoulat I, Marcolongo R, Bonadiman L, Deccache A. Reconsidering patient empowerment in chronic illness: A critique of models of self-efficacy and bodily control. Social Science & Medicine. 2008;66(5):1228–1239. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beauchamp T, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7. Oxford University Press; 2013.