Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2021 Oct;40(10):2199-2206.
doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04320-4. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

The role of mouthwash sampling in SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

The role of mouthwash sampling in SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis

Asaf Biber et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Background: The current practice of COVID-19 diagnosis worldwide is the use of oro-nasopharyngeal (ONP) swabs. Our study aim was to explore mouthwash (MW) as an alternative diagnostic method, in light of the disadvantages of ONP swabs.

Methods: COVID-19 outpatients molecular-confirmed by ONP swab were repeatedly examined with ONP swab and MW with normal saline (0.9%). Other types of fluids were compared to normal saline. The Cq values obtained with each method were compared.

Results: Among 137 pairs of ONP swabs and MW samples, 84.6% (116/137) of ONP swabs were positive by at least one of the genes (N, E, R). However MW detected 70.8% (97/137) of samples as positive, which means 83.6% (97/116) out of positive ONP swabs, missing mainly Cq value > 30. In both methods, the N gene was the most sensitive one. Therefore, MW samples targeting N gene, which was positive in 95/137 (69.3%), are comparable to ONP swabs targeting E and R genes which gave equal results-95/137 (69.3%) and 90/137 (65.7%), respectively. Comparing saline MW to distilled water gave equal results, while commercial mouth-rinsing solutions were less sensitive.

Conclusions: MW with normal saline, especially when tested by N gene, can effectively detect COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, this method was not inferior when compared to R and E genes of ONP swabs, which are common targets in many laboratories around the world.

Keywords: COVID-19; Gargling; Mouth rinse; Saliva; Throat-wash.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Number of positive results of oro-nasopharyngeal swab (N = 137 tests) in each target (N, E, R genes) and their overlapping
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Number of positive results of saline mouthwash (N = 137 tests) in each target (N, E, R genes) and their overlapping
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
MW as tested by the N target in comparison to ONP swabs tested by N, E, and R targets (n = 137). N gene ONP swab, positive samples of ONP swabs tested by N target; E gene ONP swab, positive samples of ONP swabs tested by E target; R gene ONP swab, positive samples of ONP swabs tested by R target; N gene MW, positive samples of MW tested by N target
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
The performance of different mouth-fluid washes in comparison to positive samples by ONP swabs as tested by N target. N-ONP, positive samples of ONP swabs tested by N target; ONP-3 pos genes, ONP swabs positive in all 3 gene targets (N,E,R); N saline, positive samples of saline MW tested by N target; N water, positive samples of water MW tested by N target; N Orbitol, positive samples of Orbitol MW tested by N target; N Listerine, positive samples of Listerine MW tested by N target. *137 samples were tested; among them, 114 were positive in ONP tested by N target (= 100%). **59 samples were tested; among them, 48 were positive in ONP tested by N target (= 100%). ***16 samples of Orbitol were tested; among them, 12 were positive in ONP tested by N target (= 100%). Twelve samples of Listerine were tested; among them, 12 were positive in ONP tested by N target (= 100%)

References

    1. World Health Organization (2020) Weekly Operational Update on COVID-19, 4 September 2020. World Health Organization 1:6
    1. Tromberg BJ, Schwetz TA, Pérez-Stable EJ, et al. Rapid scaling up of Covid-19 diagnostic testing in the United States - the NIH RADx initiative. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(11):1071–1077. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2022263. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pan Y, Zhang D, Yang P, Poon LLM, Wang Q. Viral load of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(4):411–412. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30113-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zou L, Ruan F, Huang M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 viral load in upper respiratory specimens of infected patients. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(12):1177–1179. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2001737. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. To KK, Tsang OT, Leung WS, et al. Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):565–574. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30196-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types