Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Nov;40(11):2379-2388.
doi: 10.1007/s10096-021-04327-x. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

Accuracy of saliva and nasopharyngeal sampling for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in community screening: a multicentric cohort study

Affiliations

Accuracy of saliva and nasopharyngeal sampling for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in community screening: a multicentric cohort study

Solen Kernéis et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021 Nov.

Abstract

Nasopharyngeal sampling for nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) is the standard diagnostic test of coronavirus disease 2019. Our objectives were to assess, in real-life conditions, the diagnostic accuracy of a nasopharyngeal point-of-care antigen (Ag) test and of saliva NAAT for detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in ambulatory care. This was a prospective cohort study from 19 October through 18 December 2020 in two community COVID-19 screening centers in Paris, France. Two nasopharyngeal swabs and one saliva sample were simultaneously collected. Diagnostic accuracies of nasopharyngeal Ag testing and of three saliva NAAT methods were assessed as compared to nasopharyngeal NAAT. A total of 1452 ambulatory children and adults were included. Overall, 129/1443 (9%) participants tested positive on nasopharyngeal NAAT (102/564 [18%] in symptomatic and 27/879 [3%] in asymptomatic participants). Sensitivity was 94%, 23%, 96%, and 94% for the three different protocols of saliva NAAT and for the nasopharyngeal Ag test, respectively. Estimates of specificity were above 95% for all methods. Diagnostic accuracy was similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Diagnostic accuracy of nasopharyngeal Ag testing and of saliva NAAT is similar to that of nasopharyngeal NAAT, subject to compliance with specific protocols for saliva. Registration number: NCT04578509.

Keywords: Antigen test; Diagnostic performances; Nucleic acid amplification testing; SARS-CoV-2; Saliva.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Ct values for nasopharyngeal nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) and saliva NAAT (method MGI-2) according to the presence of symptoms and timing of testing after symptoms onset. (1A) nasopharyngeal Ct values, (1B) saliva Ct values (MGI-2)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A, B) Ct values for saliva NAAT (method MGI-2) according to the result of the nasopharyngeal NAAT

References

    1. Paltiel AD, Zheng A, Sax PE. Clinical and economic effects of widespread rapid testing to decrease SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Ann Intern Med [Internet]. 2021 Mar 9 [cited 2021 Mar 16]; Available from: https://www.acpjournals.org/10.7326/M21-0510 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bosetti P, Kiem CT, Yazdanpanah Y, Fontanet A, Lina B, Colizza V, et al. Impact of mass testing during an epidemic rebound of SARS-CoV-2: a modelling study using the example of France. Euro Surveill. 2021 Jan;26(1). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Du Z, Pandey A, Bai Y, Fitzpatrick MC, Chinazzi M, Piontti AP, y, , et al. Comparative cost-effectiveness of SARS-CoV-2 testing strategies in the USA: a modelling study. Lancet Public Health. 2021;6(3):e184–91. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00002-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cheng MP, Papenburg J, Desjardins M, Kanjilal S, Quach C, Libman M, et al. Diagnostic testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2: a narrative review. Ann Intern Med. 2020;172(11):726–734. doi: 10.7326/M20-1301. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mustafa Hellou M, Górska A, Mazzaferri F, Cremonini E, Gentilotti E, De Nardo P, et al. Nucleic acid amplification tests on respiratory samples for the diagnosis of coronavirus infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021;27(3):341–351. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data