Applications of machine and deep learning to patient-specific IMRT/VMAT quality assurance
- PMID: 34343412
- PMCID: PMC8425899
- DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13375
Applications of machine and deep learning to patient-specific IMRT/VMAT quality assurance
Abstract
In order to deliver accurate and safe treatment to cancer patients in radiation therapy using advanced techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-arc radiation therapy (VMAT), patient specific quality assurance (QA) should be performed before treatment. IMRT/VMAT dose measurements in a phantom using various devices have been clinically adopted as standard method for QA. This approach allows the verification of the accuracy of the dose calculation, data transfer, and the delivery system. However, patient-specific QA procedures are expensive and require significant time and effort by the physicists. Over the past 5 years, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms for predictions of IMRT/VMAT QA outcome have been investigated. Various ML and DL models have shown promising prediction accuracy and a high potential as time-efficient virtual QA tool. In this paper, we review the ML and DL based models that were developed for patient specific IMRT and VMAT QA outcome predictions from algorithmic and clinical applicability perspectives. We focus on comparing the algorithms, the dataset sizes, the input parameters and features, the QA outcome prediction approaches, the validation, the performance, the clinical applicability, and the potential clinical impact. In addition, we discuss the present challenges as well as the future directions in the implementation of these models. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review on the application of ML and DL based models in IMRT/VMAT QA predictions.
Keywords: IMRT quality assurance; VMAT quality assurance; deep learning; gamma passing rate prediction; machine learning; patient-specific QA; radiation therapy.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Figures


Similar articles
-
A unified deep-learning framework for enhanced patient-specific quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans.Med Phys. 2025 Mar;52(3):1878-1892. doi: 10.1002/mp.17601. Epub 2024 Dec 24. Med Phys. 2025. PMID: 39718209 Free PMC article.
-
A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Jan;18(1):128-138. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12017. Epub 2016 Dec 8. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017. PMID: 28291913 Free PMC article.
-
A novel approach to EPID-based 3D volumetric dosimetry for IMRT and VMAT QA.Phys Med Biol. 2018 May 22;63(11):115002. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aac1a6. Phys Med Biol. 2018. PMID: 29714714
-
Applications of artificial intelligence for machine- and patient-specific quality assurance in radiation therapy: current status and future directions.J Radiat Res. 2024 Jul 22;65(4):421-432. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrae033. J Radiat Res. 2024. PMID: 38798135 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Integration of AI and Machine Learning in Radiotherapy QA.Front Artif Intell. 2020 Sep 29;3:577620. doi: 10.3389/frai.2020.577620. eCollection 2020. Front Artif Intell. 2020. PMID: 33733216 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A predictive quality assurance model for patient-specific gamma passing rate of hyperarc-based stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery of brain metastases.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Sep;26(9):e70225. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70225. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025. PMID: 40841177 Free PMC article.
-
Differentiation of Benign From Malignant Parotid Gland Tumors Using Conventional MRI Based on Radiomics Nomogram.Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 11;12:937050. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.937050. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35898886 Free PMC article.
-
Detecting outliers beyond tolerance limits derived from statistical process control in patient-specific quality assurance.J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Feb;25(2):e14154. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14154. Epub 2023 Sep 8. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024. PMID: 37683120 Free PMC article.
-
Detection of the failed-tolerance causes of electronic-portal-imaging-device-based in vivo dosimetry using machine learning for volumetric-modulated arc therapy: A feasibility study.Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025 May 17;34:100785. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100785. eCollection 2025 Apr. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40491759 Free PMC article.
-
Reduction of patient specific quality assurance through plan complexity metrics for VMAT plans with an open-source TPS script.Z Med Phys. 2024 Nov;34(4):555-564. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Mar 29. Z Med Phys. 2024. PMID: 37001999 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ezzell GA, Burmeister JW, Dogan N, et al. IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119. Med Phys. 2009;36:5359‐5373. - PubMed
-
- ICRU. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements . Prescribing, recording and reporting photon‐beam intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). ICRU report 83, J ICRU. 2010;10(1):1‐106.
-
- Miften M, Olch A, Mihailidis D, Moran J, Pawlicki T, Molineu A, Li H, Wijesooriya K, Shi J, Xia P, Papanikolaou N, Low DA. Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement‐based verification QA: recommendations of AAPM Task Group. No. 218. Med Phys. 2018;45:e53–e83. - PubMed
-
- Low DA, Moran JM, Dempsey JF, Dong L, Oldham M. Dosimetry tools and techniques for IMRT. Med Phys. 2011;38(3):1313‐1338. - PubMed
-
- Low DA, Harms WB, Mutic S, Purdy JA. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys. 1998;25(5):656‐661. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous