Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;30(10):106009.
doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106009. Epub 2021 Jul 31.

Computational Fluid Dynamics in Intracranial Atherosclerosis - Lessons from Cardiology: A Review of CFD in Intracranial Atherosclerosis

Affiliations

Computational Fluid Dynamics in Intracranial Atherosclerosis - Lessons from Cardiology: A Review of CFD in Intracranial Atherosclerosis

Davor Pavlin-Premrl et al. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Intracranial atherosclerosis is a common cause of stroke with a high recurrence rate. Haemodynamically significant lesions are associated with a particularly high risk of recurrence. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is a tool that has been investigated to identify haemodynamically significant lesions. CFD in the intracranial vasculature benefits from the precedent set by cardiology, where CFD is an established clinical tool. This precedent is particularly important in CFD as models are very heterogenous. There are many decisions-points in the model-creation process, usually involving a trade-off between computational expense and accuracy.

Objectives: This study aimed to review published CFD models in intracranial atherosclerosis and compare them to those used in cardiology.

Methods: A systematic search for all published computational fluid dynamics models applied to intracranial atherosclerosis was performed. Each study was analysed as regards to the different steps in creating a fluid dynamics model and findings were compared with established cardiology CFD models.

Results and conclusion: 38 papers were screened and 12 were included in the final analysis. There were important differences between coronary and intracranial atherosclerosis models in the following areas: area of interest segmented, use of transient models vs steady-state models, boundary conditions, methods for solving the fluid dynamics equations and validation. These differences may be high-yield areas to explore for future research.

Keywords: CTFFR; Computational fluid dynamics; Fractional flow reserve; Intracranial atherosclerosis; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources