Do non-rearfoot runners experience greater second metatarsal stresses than rearfoot runners?
- PMID: 34343863
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110647
Do non-rearfoot runners experience greater second metatarsal stresses than rearfoot runners?
Abstract
Stress fracture of the second metatarsal is a common and problematic injury for runners. The choice of foot strike pattern is known to affect external kinetics and kinematics but its effect on internal loading of the metatarsals is not well understood. Models of various complexities can be used to investigate the effects of running characteristics on metatarsal stresses. This study aimed to compare second metatarsal stress between habitual rearfoot and non-rearfoot strikers during barefoot running, using a novel participant-specific finite element model, including accurate metatarsal and soft tissue geometry. Synchronised force and kinematic data were collected during barefoot overground running from 20 participants (12 rearfoot strikers). Stresses were calculated using a previously evaluated and published 3D finite element model. Non-rearfoot strikers demonstrated greater external loading and joint contact forces than rearfoot runners, but there were no differences in stresses between groups. Additionally, the study allowed for a qualitative assessment of bone geometries and stresses. No correlation was found between bone volume and stresses, however, there was found to be a large variation in metatarsal shapes, possibly accounting for the lack of difference in stresses. This emphasises the importance of bone geometry when estimating bone stress and supports the suggestion that external forces should not be assumed to be representative of internal loading.
Keywords: Finite element; Metatarsal; Running; Stress fracture.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Incorporating subject-specific geometry to compare metatarsal stress during running with different foot strike patterns.J Biomech. 2020 May 22;105:109792. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109792. Epub 2020 Apr 9. J Biomech. 2020. PMID: 32327192
-
Three dimensional finite element modelling of metatarsal stresses during running.J Med Eng Technol. 2020;44(7):368-377. doi: 10.1080/03091902.2020.1799092. Epub 2020 Aug 7. J Med Eng Technol. 2020. PMID: 32762585
-
In-shoe loading in rearfoot and non-rearfoot strikers during running using minimalist footwear.Int J Sports Med. 2014 Dec;35(13):1112-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1372627. Epub 2014 Jun 30. Int J Sports Med. 2014. PMID: 24977946
-
Foot Strike Patterns During Overground Distance Running: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sports Med Open. 2021 Nov 10;7(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s40798-021-00369-9. Sports Med Open. 2021. PMID: 34757569 Free PMC article.
-
What are the Benefits and Risks Associated with Changing Foot Strike Pattern During Running? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Injury, Running Economy, and Biomechanics.Sports Med. 2020 May;50(5):885-917. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01238-y. Sports Med. 2020. PMID: 31823338
Cited by
-
Curved carbon-plated shoe may further reduce forefoot loads compared to flat plate during running.Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 8;14(1):13215. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64177-3. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38851842 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating personalized shape prediction, biomechanical modeling, and wearables for bone stress prediction in runners.NPJ Digit Med. 2025 May 13;8(1):276. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01677-0. NPJ Digit Med. 2025. PMID: 40360731 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of different inner pressures of air insoles and walking durations on plantar pressure time integral.Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 20;14(1):19272. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70312-x. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39164374 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources