Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 3;21(1):384.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03386-w.

Acceptability of a digital return-to-work intervention for common mental disorders: a qualitative study on service user perspectives

Affiliations

Acceptability of a digital return-to-work intervention for common mental disorders: a qualitative study on service user perspectives

Patrik Engdahl et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: There is an evident discrepancy between need and provision of evidence-based return-to-work (RTW) interventions in existing mental health services. Online dissemination of evidence-based interventions is presumed to reduce this gap. However, there is almost no knowledge available on perceived acceptability of digital RTW interventions among service users, which are factors that might influence the development and implementation of future interventions. The aim of this study was to develop knowledge of service user acceptability of mWorks, a proposed digital RTW solution.

Methods: Participants (n = 18) with experience of common mental disorder and sick leave were recruited with a purposive snowball sampling method. Semi-structured interviews (n = 12) and one focus group interview (n = 6) were conducted. A deductive thematic analysis was performed according to the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.

Results: Digital RTW interventions were perceived as acceptable and aligned with participant value. Participants expressed positive attitudes toward having access to support, regardless of time and place. A certain ambiguity between a decline in social interactions and opportunities to RTW in a safe space was reported. Participants were confident in their ability to use digital RTW solutions, but reported the need to reduce stressful elements of using smartphones. Overly demanding digital solutions, i.e. ones requiring high cognitive effort, were described as burdensome.

Conclusions: For digital RTW solutions to be acceptable, they need to complement traditional services by providing accessible and person-centred support throughout the RTW process. They should be designed to reduce the need for cognitive effort. Future research should explore how to balance user autonomy with other support components in digital interventions.

Keywords: Anxiety; Depression; Digital solution; Mental health; Return to work; Vocational rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Theoretical Framework of Acceptability (TFA), developed by Sekhon and colleagues. TFA is a multi-faceted framework that reflects the extent to which people delivering or receiving a healthcare intervention consider it to be appropriate, based on anticipated or experiential cognitive and emotional responses to the interventions [24]

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization . Depression and other common mental disorders: global health estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. pp. 1–17.
    1. OECD/European Union . Health at a Glance: Europe 2018: State of Health in the EU Cycle. Brussels: OECD Publishing, Paris/European Union; 2018.
    1. Dewa CS, Loong D, Bonato S. Work outcomes of sickness absence related to mental disorders: a systematic literature review. BMJ Open. 2014;4(7):e005533. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005533. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dewa CS, Chau N, Dermer S. Examining the comparative incidence and costs of physical and mental health-related disabilities in an employed population. J Occup Environ Med. 2010;52(7):758–762. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181e8cfb5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joyce S, Modini M, Christensen H, Mykletun A, Bryant R, Mitchell PB, Harvey SB. Workplace interventions for common mental disorders: a systematic meta-review. Psychol Med. 2016;46(4):683–697. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715002408. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types