Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Aug:126:108085.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108085.

Reviewing chemical and biological risks in urban agriculture: A comprehensive framework for a food safety assessment of city region food systems

E Buscaroli  1 , I Braschi  1 , C Cirillo  2 , A Fargue-Lelièvre  3 , G C Modarelli  2 , G Pennisi  1 , I Righini  4 , K Specht  5 , F Orsini  1
Affiliations
Review

Reviewing chemical and biological risks in urban agriculture: A comprehensive framework for a food safety assessment of city region food systems

E Buscaroli et al. Food Control. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Attention to urban agriculture (UA) has recently grown among practitioners, scientists, and the public, resulting in several initiatives worldwide. Despite the positive perception of modern UA and locally grown, fresh produce, the potential food safety risks connected to these practices may be underestimated, leading to regulatory gaps. Thus, there is a need for assessment tools to evaluate the food safety risks connected to specific UA initiatives, to assist practitioners in self-evaluation and control, and to provide policy makers and scholars a means to pursue and assess food safety in city regions, avoiding either a lack or an excess of regulation that could ultimately hinder the sector. To address this aim, this paper reviews the most recent and relevant literature on UA food safety assessments. Food safety indicators were identified first. Then, a food safety assessment framework for UA initiatives was developed. The framework uses business surveys and food analyses (if available) as a data source for calculating a food safety index for single UA businesses and the whole UA landscape of a given city region. The proposed framework was designed to allow its integration into the CRFS (City Region Food System) toolkit developed by FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), RUAF foundation (Resource Centres on Urban Agriculture and Food Security) and Wilfrid Laurier University.

Keywords: CRFS framework Assessment; Food policy; Food safety indicators; Risk assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scheme for the systematic literature search.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Number of papers per hazard category per year (2011–2020).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Reference scatter plot for analysis between FSI and business maturity.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aarestrup F.M., Wegener H.C., Collignon P. Resistance in bacteria of the food chain: Epidemiology and control strategies. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. 2008;6(5):733–750. doi: 10.1586/14787210.6.5.733. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abubakari A.-H., Husseini R., Addi P.E. Strategies for minimising health risks of wastewater for poor farmers in the urban environment. Acta Horticulturae. 2011;911:123–132. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2011.911.13. - DOI
    1. Al-Megrin W.A.I. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in leafy vegetables in riyadh, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Zoological Research. 2010;6(3):190–195. doi: 10.3923/ijzr.2010.190.195. - DOI
    1. Amato-Lourenço L.F., Moreira T.C.L., De Oliveira Souza V.C., Barbosa F., Jr., Saiki M., Saldiva P.H.N., Mauad T. The influence of atmospheric particles on the elemental content of vegetables in urban gardens of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Environmental Pollution. 2016;216:125–134. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.05.036. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amoah P., Drechsel P., Abaidoo R.C. Irrigated urban vegetable production in Ghana: Sources of pathogen contamination and health risk elimination. Irrigation and Drainage. 2005;54(S1):S49–S61. doi: 10.1002/ird.185. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources