Reducing Unnecessary Laboratory Utilization in the Medical ICU: A Fellow-Driven Quality Improvement Initiative
- PMID: 34345825
- PMCID: PMC8322547
- DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000499
Reducing Unnecessary Laboratory Utilization in the Medical ICU: A Fellow-Driven Quality Improvement Initiative
Abstract
Objectives: Overutilization of laboratory services is now recognized as harmful to patients and wasteful. In fact, the American Board of Internal Medicine's Choosing Wisely campaign recommends against ordering routine testing that does not answer a clinical question. Per peer benchmarking, our institution as a whole occupied an extreme outlier position at the 100th percentile for laboratory utilization. We sought to address this problem starting in our medical ICUs with a quality improvement project.
Design: Quality improvement project using the design, measure, analyze, improve, and control process. The primary endpoint was a sustained reduction in laboratory utilization. Counterbalance metrics were also followed, and these included mortality, renal replacement therapy initiation rates, stat laboratory orders, and central catheter-associated blood stream infections.
Setting: The medical ICU at the Ohio State University Medical Center.
Patients: All patients admitted to the medical ICU from March 2019 to March 2020.
Interventions: Root causes were identified and addressed with the implementation of a wide range of interventions involving a multidisciplinary team led by trainee physicians.
Measurements and main results: There was a sustained 20% reduction in the number of tests performed per patient day, with no change in the counterbalance metrics.
Conclusions: Trainees can affect positive change in the culture and processes at their institutions to safely reduce laboratory utilization.
Keywords: critical care; evidence-based medicine; healthcare costs; laboratories; patient safety; quality improvement.
Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have disclosed that they do not have any conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Flabouris A, Bishop G, Williams L, et al. : Routine blood test ordering for patients in intensive care. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000; 28:562–565 - PubMed
-
- Holland J, Peralta RM, Moss RL, et al. : A single-centre review of iatrogenic anaemia in adult intensive care. Transfus Med. 2020; 30:196–200 - PubMed
-
- Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC): Health Care Spending and the Medicare Program. 2020. Available at: http://www.medpac.gov/docs/default-source/data-book/july2020_databook_en.... Accessed September 9, 2020
-
- Critical Care Societies Collaborative. ABIM Foundation; Choosing Wisely List for Critical Care: Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question, 2014. Available at: http://ccsconline.org/images/CCSC-Choosing-Wisely.pdf. Accessed September 9, 2020
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
