Reply
- PMID: 34346120
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.23721
Reply
Comment on
-
Outcome-based comparison of SMFM and ISUOG definitions of fetal growth restriction.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun;57(6):925-930. doi: 10.1002/uog.23638. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33798274
-
Diagnostic criteria for fetal growth restriction: sensitivity, specificity and clinical role across gestation.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;58(2):329. doi: 10.1002/uog.23720. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 34346121 No abstract available.
References
-
- Roeckner JT, Pressman K, Odibo L, Duncan JR, Odibo AO. An outcome-based comparison of two international guidelines for defining fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021; 57: 925-930.
-
- Martins JG, Biggio JR, Abuhamad A. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 223: B2-B17.
-
- Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A, da Silva Costa F, Ferrazzi E, Figueras F, Hecher K, Kingdom J, Poon LC, Salomon LJ, Unterscheider J. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2020; 56: 298-312.
-
- Nwabuobi C, Odibo L, Camisasca-Lopina H, Leavitt K, Tuuli M, Odibo AO. Comparing INTERGROWTH-21st Century and Hadlock growth standards to predict small for gestational age and short-term neonatal outcomes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020; 33: 1906-1912.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources