Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jul-Aug;139(4):305-311.
doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2020.0721.R1.23122020.

Validity and reliability of the Neonatal Infant Acute Pain Assessment Scale (NIAPAS) in Turkish: prospective study

Bahar Nur Kanbur  1 , Birsen Mutlu  2 , Özgül Salihoğlu  3
Affiliations

Validity and reliability of the Neonatal Infant Acute Pain Assessment Scale (NIAPAS) in Turkish: prospective study

Bahar Nur Kanbur et al. Sao Paulo Med J. 2021 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: Using pain scales helps nurses in making early diagnoses and in assessing and managing pain symptoms and findings when developing a nursing care plan.

Objective: To determine the validity and reliability of the Turkish form of the Neonatal Infant Acute Pain Assessment Scale (NIAPAS).

Design and setting: Prospective study conducted in Istanbul Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Methods: 145 newborns in the 26th to 42nd gestational weeks that were receiving treatment and care in the neonatal intensive care unit were included in this study. A total of 1740 pain assessments were made by two independent observers on these 145 newborns. The research data was collected using a newborn description form, NIAPAS and the Neonatal Infant Pain Scale (NIPS).

Results: The scope validity index of NIAPAS was found to be between 0.90 and 1.00 and its Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.914. Correlations between characteristics and total scores (r = 0.20-0.82) were found to be sufficiently high. In an assessment on concurrency validity, there was a strong positive relationship between NIAPAS and NIPS scores (r = 0.73-0.82; P < 0.000). From kappa analysis (0.73-0.99) and intraclass correlation (r = 0.75-0.96), it was determined that there was concordance between the observers.

Conclusion: NIAPAS was found to be a valid and reliable scale for evaluating acute pain in newborns.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Grunau RE. Neonatal pain in very preterm infants: long-term effects on brain, neurodevelopment and pain reactivity. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2013;4(4):e0025. doi: 10.5041/RMMJ.10132. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carbajal R, Rousset A, Danan C, et al. Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in intensive care units. JAMA. 2008;300(1):60–70. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.1.60. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gargiulo AD, Lynch AM, Slogar A. Managing Heel Stick Pain in Newborn. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, Neonatal Nursing. 2010;39(Suppl 1):S42. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2010.01120.x. - DOI
    1. Britto CD, Rao Pn S, Nesargi S, et al. PAIN--perception and assessment of painful procedures in the NICU. J Trop Pediatr. 2014;60(6):422–7. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmu039. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dinçer Ş, Yurtçu M, Günel E. Yenidoğanlarda Ağrı ve Nonfarmakolojik Tedavi [Pain in Newborns and Nonpharmacologic Treatment Procedures] Selçuk Üniv Tıp Derg. 2011;271(1):46–51. Available from: https://selcukmedj.org/uploads/publications/SUTD-73.pdf.