Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan;25(1):1-15.
doi: 10.1007/s10123-021-00200-1. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

Microbial interactions in alcoholic beverages

Affiliations
Review

Microbial interactions in alcoholic beverages

Rafael Torres-Guardado et al. Int Microbiol. 2022 Jan.

Abstract

This review examines the different types of interactions between the microorganisms involved in the fermentation processes of alcoholic beverages produced all over the world from cereals or fruit juices. The alcoholic fermentation converting sugars into ethanol is usually carried out by yeasts, mainly Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which can grow directly using fruit sugars, such as those in grapes for wine or apples for cider, or on previously hydrolyzed starch of cereals, such as for beers. Some of these beverages, or the worts obtained from cereals, can be distilled to obtain spirits. Besides S. cerevisiae, all alcoholic beverages can contain other microorganisms and especially in spontaneous fermentation when starter cultures are not used. These other microbes are mostly lactic acid bacteria and other yeasts-the non-Saccharomyces yeasts. The interactions between all these microorganisms are very diverse and complex, as in any natural occurring ecosystem, including food fermentations. To describe them, we have followed a simplified ecological classification of the interactions. The negative ones are amensalism, by which a metabolic product of one species has a negative effect on others, and antagonism, by which one microbe competes directly with others. The positive interactions are commensalism, by which one species has benefits but no apparent effect on others, and synergism, by which there are benefits for all the microbes and also for the final product. The main interactions in alcoholic beverages are between S. cerevisiae and non-Saccharomyces and between yeasts and lactic acid bacteria. These interactions can be related to metabolites produced by fermentation such as ethanol, or to secondary metabolites such as proteinaceous toxins, or are feed-related, either by competition for nutrients or by benefit from released compounds during yeast autolysis. The positive or negative effects of these interactions on the organoleptic qualities of the final product are also revised. Focusing mainly on the alcoholic beverages produced by spontaneous fermentations, this paper reviews the interactions between the different yeasts and lactic acid bacteria in wine, cider, beer, and in spirits such as tequila, mezcal and cachaça.

Keywords: Amensalism; Antagonism; Commensalism; Spirits; Synergism; Wine.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Albergaria H, Francisco D, Gori K, Arneborg N, Gírio F (2010) Saccharomyces cerevisiae CCMI 885 secretes peptides that inhibit the growth of some non-Saccharomyces wine-related strains. Appl Microb Cell Physiol 86:965–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2409-6 - DOI
    1. Alexandre H, Costello PJ, Remize F, Guzzo J, Guilloux-Benatier M (2004) Saccharomyces cerevisiae-Oenococcus oeni interactions in wine: current knowledge and perspectives. Int J Food Microbiol 93:141–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2003.10.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Antón-Díaz MJ, Vallés BS, Mangas-Alonso JJ, Fernández-García O, Picinelli-Lobo A (2016) Impact of different techniques involving contact with lees on the volatile composition of cider. Food Chem 190:1116–1122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.06.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arellano-Plaza M, Gschaedler-Mathis A, Noriega-Cisneros R, Clemente-Guerrero M, Manzo-Ávalos S, González-Hernández JC, Saavedra-Molina A (2013) Respiratory capacity of the Kluyveromyces marxianus yeast isolated from the mezcal process during oxidative stress. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 29:1279–1287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-013-1291-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnink K, Henick-Kling T (2005) Influence of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Oenococcus oeni strains on successful malolactic conversion in wine. Am J Enol Vitic 56:228–237 ( https://www.ajevonline.org/content/56/3/228.short )

LinkOut - more resources