Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021;30(5):462-469.
doi: 10.1159/000518262. Epub 2021 Jul 7.

New Parameter of the Second Half of the P-Wave, P-Wave Duration, and Atrial Conduction Times Predict Atrial Fibrillation during Electrophysiological Studies

Affiliations

New Parameter of the Second Half of the P-Wave, P-Wave Duration, and Atrial Conduction Times Predict Atrial Fibrillation during Electrophysiological Studies

Raimundo Carmona Puerta et al. Med Princ Pract. 2021.

Abstract

Objective: Several P-wave parameters reflect atrial conduction characteristics and have been used to predict atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between maximum P-wave duration (PMax) and new P-wave parameters, with atrial conduction times (CT), and to assess their predictive value of AF during electrophysiological studies (AF-EPS).

Subjects and methods: This was a cross-sectional study in 153 randomly selected patients aged 18-70 years, undergoing EPS. The patients were divided into 2 groups designated as no AF-EPS and AF-EPS, depending on whether AF occurred during EPS or not. Different P-wave parameters and atrial CT were compared for both study groups. Subsequently, the predictive value of the P-wave parameters and the atrial CT for AF-EPS was evaluated.

Results: The values of CT, PMax, and maximum Ppeak-Pend interval (Pp-eMax) were significantly higher in patients with AF-EPS. Almost all P-wave parameters were correlated with the left CT. PMax, Pp-eMax, and CT were univariate and multivariate predictors of AF-EPS. The largest ROC area was presented by interatrial CT (0.852; p < 0.001; cutoff value: ≥82.5 ms; sensitivity: 91.1%; specificity: 81.1%). Pp-eMax showed greater sensitivity (79.5%) to discriminate AF-EPS than PMax (72.7%), but the latter had better specificity (60.4% vs. 41.5%).

Conclusions: Left atrial CT were directly and significantly correlated with PMax and almost all the parameters of the second half of the P-wave. CT, PMax, and Pp-eMax (new parameter) were good predictors of AF-EPS, although CT did more robustly.

Keywords: Atrial conduction time; Atrial fibrillation; Electrocardiogram; Electrophysiological study; P-wave.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ROC curves showing the relationship between sensitivity and specificity through all possible values of atrial conduction times and P-wave parameters that define patients with atrial fibrillation in the electrophysiological study. a Analysis for atrial conduction times and b analysis for P-wave parameters. ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under the ROC curve; DCS-PCS, left intra-atrial conduction time; P-DCS, P-distal coronary sinus interval; PMax, maximum P-wave duration; P-PCS, P-proximal coronary sinus interval; Pp-eMax, maximum Ppeak-Pend interval.

References

    1. Chen Q, Gasperetti A, Della Rocca DG, Mohanty S, Gedikli O, Trivedi C, et al. The value of baseline and arrhythmic ECG in the interpretation of arrhythmic mechanisms. Card Electrophysiol Clin. 2019;11:219–38. - PubMed
    1. Carmona Puerta R, Lorenzo Martínez E. P wave dispersion over two decades after its discovery. What the cardiologist should know. CardioClinics. 2021;56((1)):49–57.
    1. Maheshwari A, Norby FL, Roetker NS, Soliman EZ, Koene RJ, Rooney MR, et al. Refining prediction of atrial fibrillation-related stroke using the P2-CHA2DS2-VASc score: ARIC and MESA. Circulation. 2019;139:180–91. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Magnani JW, Zhu L, Lopez F, Pencina MJ, Agarwal SK, Soliman EZ, et al. P-wave indices and atrial fibrillation: cross-cohort assessments from the Framingham heart study (FHS) and atherosclerosis risk in communities (ARIC) study. Am Heart J. 2015;169:53–e1. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Platonov PG. Atrial conduction and atrial fibrillation: what can we learn from surface ECG? Cardiol J. 2008;15:402–7. - PubMed