Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Aug 4;18(1):168.
doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01218-4.

Perceptions of family, community and religious leaders and acceptability for minimal invasive tissue sampling to identify the cause of death in under-five deaths and stillbirths in North India: a qualitative study

Manoja Kumar Das  1 , Narendra Kumar Arora  2 , Gurkirat Kaur  2 , Prikanksha Malik  2 , Mahisha Kumari  2 , Shipra Joshi  2 , Reeta Rasaily  3 , Harish Chellani  4 , Harsha Gaikwad  5 , Pradeep Debata  4 , K R Meena  4
Affiliations

Perceptions of family, community and religious leaders and acceptability for minimal invasive tissue sampling to identify the cause of death in under-five deaths and stillbirths in North India: a qualitative study

Manoja Kumar Das et al. Reprod Health. .

Abstract

Background: Minimal invasive tissue sampling (MITS) has emerged as a suitable alternative to complete diagnostic autopsy (CDA) for determination of the cause of death (CoD), due to feasibility and acceptability issues. A formative research was conducted to document the perceptions of parents, community and religious leaders on acceptability of MITS.

Methods: This qualitative study was conducted at and around the Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, India. Participants for in-depth interview included the parents who had either child or neonatal death or stillbirth and the key community and religious representatives. The focus group discussions (FGDs) involved community members. Process of obtaining consent for MITS was observed. Data were analyzed inductively manually for emerging themes and codes.

Results: A total of 104 interviews (parents of deceased children, neonates or stillbirths, n = 93; community members, n = 8 and religious leaders, n = 7), 8 FGDs (n = 72) were conducted and process of obtaining consent for MITS (n = 27) was observed. The participants were positive and expressed willingness to accept MITS. The key determinants for acceptance of MITS were: (1) understanding and willingness to know the cause of death or stillbirth, (2) experience of the healthcare received and trust, (3) the religious and sociocultural norms. Parents and community favored for MITS over CDA when needed, especially where in cases with past stillbirths and child deaths. The experience of treatment, attitude and communication from healthcare providers emerged as important for consent. The decision making process was collective involving the elders and family. No religious leader was against the procedure, as both, the respect for the deceased and need for medical care were satisfied.

Conclusions: Largely, MITS appeared to be acceptable for identifying the causes of child deaths and stillbirths, if the parents and family are counseled appropriately considering the sociocultural and religious aspects. They perceived the quality of care, attitude and communication by the healthcare providers as critical factors for acceptance of MITS.

Keywords: Cause of death; Child; Community; Formative research; India; Minimal invasive tissue sampling; Neonates; Parents; Religious leaders; Stillbirth.

Plain language summary

India tops the chart of childhood deaths and stillbirths globally. The causes of many childhood deaths and stillbirths remain unknown or ill-defined in India. For planning the health policies, program and clinical practices, the cause of death (CoD) and stillbirth are primarily determined by verbal autopsy (VA) method, which has several inherent limitations. The acceptance and implementation of complete diagnostic autopsy (CDA) or full autopsy for CoD determination is limited. Minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) is a suitable alternative to full autopsy for CoD determination. MITS has been found to be acceptable and being implemented in some low and middle income countries. Considering the multi-religion and sociocultural contexts of India, an understanding about the perceptions, practices, acceptance and barriers among the parents, community members and religious leaders regarding MITS was necessary for designing appropriate communication strategies and materials for consent. A qualitative study was undertaken in New Delhi, India using in-depth interviews with the parents of deceased children and stillbirths, community leaders, community health workers and religious leaders and focus group discussions with the community members and observation of obtaining consent for MITS. The parents and community members were positive about MITS and expressed willingness to accept it over full autopsy to know the CoD and stillbirths. The factors like past stillbirths and child deaths, experience of the healthcare received and trust, the religious and sociocultural norms emerged as important determinants for acceptance of MITS. The religious leaders were also positive about MITS if needed for treatment and benefit of the family.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no competing interests and conflict of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN. Levels & Trends in Child Mortality: Report 2019, Estimates developed by the United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. United Nations Children’s Fund, New York. 2019. https://www.unicef.org/media/60561/file/UN-IGME-child-mortality-report-2.... Accessed 30 Dec 2019.
    1. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Waiswa P, Amouzou A, Mathers C, Hogan D, et al. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet Lond Engl. 2016;387(10018):587–603. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00837-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saleem S, Tikmani SS, McClure EM, Moore JL, Azam SI, Dhaded SM, et al. Trends and determinants of stillbirth in developing countries: results from the Global Network’s Population-Based Birth Registry. Reprod Health. 2018;15(Suppl 1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12978-018-0526-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(2):e98–108. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(15)00275-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. United Nations Inter-agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation (UN. Levels and trends in child mortality: report 2018, estimates developed by the United Nations inter-agency group for child mortality estimation. United Nations Children’s Fund, New York; 2018. https://childmortality.org/files_v22/download/UN%20IGME%20Child%20Mortal.... Accessed 28 Jun 2019.