Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Dec;18(12):805-816.
doi: 10.1038/s41571-021-00538-5. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

International consensus recommendations on key outcome measures for organ preservation after (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer

Affiliations
Free article
Review

International consensus recommendations on key outcome measures for organ preservation after (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer

Emmanouil Fokas et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Multimodal treatment strategies for patients with rectal cancer are increasingly including the possibility of organ preservation, through nonoperative management or local excision. Organ preservation strategies can enable patients with a complete response or near-complete clinical responses after radiotherapy with or without concomitant chemotherapy to safely avoid the morbidities associated with radical surgery, and thus to maintain anorectal function and quality of life. However, standardization of the key outcome measures of organ preservation strategies is currently lacking; this includes a lack of consensus of the optimal definitions and selection of primary end points according to the trial phase and design; the optimal time points for response assessment; response-based decision-making; follow-up schedules; use of specific anorectal function tests; and quality of life and patient-reported outcomes. Thus, a consensus statement on outcome measures is necessary to ensure consistency and facilitate more accurate comparisons of data from ongoing and future trials. Here, we have convened an international group of experts with extensive experience in the management of patients with rectal cancer, including organ preservation approaches, and used a Delphi process to establish the first international consensus recommendations for key outcome measures of organ preservation, in an attempt to standardize the reporting of data from both trials and routine practice in this emerging area.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Beets, G. L., Figueiredo, N. F. & Beets-Tan, R. G. Management of rectal cancer without radical resection. Annu. Rev. Med. 68, 169–182 (2017). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Habr-Gama, A. et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann. Surg. 240, 711–718 (2004). - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Habr-Gama, A. et al. Organ preservation in cT2N0 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: the impact of radiation therapy dose-escalation and consolidation chemotherapy. Ann. Surg. 269, 102–107 (2019). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Maas, M. et al. Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 29, 4633–4640 (2011). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Martens, M. H. et al. Long-term outcome of an organ preservation program after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 108, djw171 (2016). - PubMed - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources