Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr-Jun;13(2):188-192.
doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_478_20. Epub 2021 May 26.

Prescription Pattern of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy in the Burn Unit of a Tertiary Care Setting in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Khaja Moinuddin  1 , Deemah Sattam Alanazi  1 , Bushra Abdulrahman Alsomali  1 , Maram Alotaibi  2 , Parthasarathy Jaganathan Parameaswari  1 , Sheraz Ali  3
Affiliations

Prescription Pattern of Empirical Antibiotic Therapy in the Burn Unit of a Tertiary Care Setting in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Khaja Moinuddin et al. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Background: It is crucial to follow rational prescribing practices while prescribing antibiotics for burn patients, thus leading to better patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to assess the initiation of empirical antibiotics in the burn unit.

Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in a large tertiary care setting of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between August 2016 and December 2018.

Results: A total of 102 hospitalized burn patients were included in this study, of whom 84 (82.4%) were males. Burns were classified as first degree, second degree, third degree, or fourth degree depending on their severity and extent of penetration into the skin. The majority (81.3%) of the patients suffered from flame burn, followed by scald (9.85), chemical (6.9%), and electrical (2%) types of burns. Broad-spectrum antibiotic such as piperacillin/tazobactam (40.57%) was the most common empirically prescribed antibiotic. In 35 patients (34.3%), there was a change in antibiotic after culture findings.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that 40% of antibiotic therapy decisions followed the recommended clinical guidelines. This study also found that Gram-negative microorganisms such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were ubiquitous in our burn unit. The study results will facilitate to develop antibiogram for our study setting, thus reducing antibiotic resistance. Further studies are needed to explore the extent and consequences of irrational antibiotic prescriptions in critically ill burn patients.

Keywords: Antibiotics; burn; pseudomonas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Prescription pattern of empirical intravenous antibiotics in burn patients (%)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of antibiotics (%)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. WHO | Burns [Online] 2019. [Last accessed on 2019 Nov 30]. Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs365/en/
    1. Infection Control in Burn Patients. [Last accessed on 2020 Sep 13]. Available from: https://www.worldburn.org/documents/infectioncontrol.pdf .
    1. Oteo J, Lázaro E, de Abajo FJ, Baquero F, Campos J. “Antimicrobial resistant invasive Escherichia coli”, Spain. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:546–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO: Hospitals Recommendations for Intervention. WHO Global Strategy for “Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance”. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2001. pp. 26–35.
    1. Rieg LS. Burn care. Metabolic alterations and nutritional management. AACN Clin Issues Crit Care Nurs. 1993;4:388–98. - PubMed