Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jun;9(11):947.
doi: 10.21037/atm-21-196.

A narrative review of hybrid ablation for persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation

Affiliations
Review

A narrative review of hybrid ablation for persistent and longstanding persistent atrial fibrillation

Ali Khoynezhad et al. Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jun.

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia and is characterized by rapid and irregular atrial activation with loss of atrial contraction. There has been a significant evolution of treatments over the past 30 years. Initially, cardiac surgeons developed approaches via sternotomy with superior efficacy, however early iterations of the procedure were associated with prolonged recovery time and frequent need for pacemaker placement. The current surgical approach to the maze procedure via sternotomy yields excellent efficacy and is a Class 1 recommendation for patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing a concomitant procedure. Several years following the initial development of the surgical maze procedure, cardiac electrophysiologists developed less invasive, however less efficacious catheter ablation options by percutaneous approach. Both the surgical and transcatheter approaches have their advantages and disadvantages with varying risks of complications and efficacy. Through the combination of expertise of cardiac surgeons paired with the electrophysiology team, a hybrid ablation procedure has been developed offering an increased efficacy with a less-invasive approach than the current gold standard treatment of Cox-maze IV procedure. This review will discuss the hybrid ablation procedure, review recent associated clinical trials, and discuss advantages and challenges associated with this multidisciplinary approach for management of patients with AF.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; cardiac surgical procedures; electrophysiology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-21-196). AK serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Annals of Translational Medicine from May 2019 to Apr 2021. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Cox JL, Schuessler RB, D'Agostino HJ, Jr, et al. The surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. III. Development of a definitive surgical procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1991;101:569-83. 10.1016/S0022-5223(19)36684-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boineau JP, Schuessler RB, Mooney CR, et al. Natural and evoked atrial flutter due to circus movement in dogs. Role of abnormal atrial pathways, slow conduction, nonuniform refractory period distribution and premature beats. Am J Cardiol 1980;45:1167-81. 10.1016/0002-9149(80)90475-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gammie JS, Haddad M, Milford-Beland S, et al. Atrial fibrillation correction surgery: lessons from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Cardiac Database. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:909-14. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.10.097 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lall SC, Melby SJ, Voeller RK, et al. The effect of ablation technology on surgical outcomes after the Cox-maze procedure: a propensity analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:389-96. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.10.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ad N, Damiano RJ, Badhwar V, et al. Expert consensus guidelines: examining surgical ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2017;153:1330-54.e1. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.02.027 - DOI - PubMed