Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;69(1-2):86-99.
doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12548. Epub 2021 Aug 4.

Development of a Youth Civic Engagement Program: Process and Pilot Testing with a Youth-Partnered Research Team

Margarita Alegría  1   2   3 , Kiara Alvarez  1   2 , Amanda NeMoyer  4 , Jenny Zhen-Duan  1   2 , Christine Marsico  5 , Isabel Shaheen O'Malley  1 , Ravali Mukthineni  1 , Thalia Porteny  6 , Carolina-Nicole Herrera  7 , Jesse Najarro Cermeño  1 , Kyle Kingston  1 , Emnet Sisay  1 , Edison Trickett  8
Affiliations

Development of a Youth Civic Engagement Program: Process and Pilot Testing with a Youth-Partnered Research Team

Margarita Alegría et al. Am J Community Psychol. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Although research suggests neighborhood-level factors influence youth well-being, few studies include youth when creating interventions to address these factors. We describe our three-step process of collaborating with youth in low-income communities to develop an intervention focused on civic engagement as a means to address neighborhood-level problems impacting their well-being. In the first step, we analyzed qualitative interviews from a project in which youth shared perceptions about their neighborhoods (e.g., interpersonal relations with neighbors and institutions). Three major themes were identified: pride in youth's communities, desire for change, and perceptions of power and responsibility. Based on these themes, we completed the second step: developing a civic engagement and leadership program, called LEAP, aimed at helping youth take an active role in addressing neighborhood problems. In the third step, we collaborated with youth who completed a pilot version of the civic program and provided feedback to finalize it for large-scale testing. While discussing our process, we highlight the importance of including youth voices when developing programs that affect them. Furthermore, we note the need for more research exploring whether civic engagement serves as a mechanism for encouraging youth involvement in addressing neighborhood-level health disparities and identifying potential psychological costs of such involvement.

Keywords: Civic engagement; Intervention development; LEAP; Neighborhood; Well-being; Youth co-creation; Youth of color.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Akiva, T., Carey, R., Cross, A., Delale-O’Connor, L. & Brown, M. (2017) Reasons youth engage in activism programs: Social justice or sanctuary? Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 53, 20-30.
    1. Alegría, M., Molina, K. & Chen, C. (2014) Neighborhood characteristics and differential risk for depressive and anxiety disorders across racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Depression and Anxiety, 31(1), 27-37.
    1. Ballard, P. J. & Ozer, E. J. (2016) The implications of youth activism for health and well-being. In: Conner, J. & Rosen, S. M. (Ed.) Contemporary youth activism: Advancing social justice in the United States. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood, pp. 223-243.
    1. Ballard, P. & Syme, S. (2015) Engaging youth in communities: A framework for promoting adolescent and community health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 70, 202-206.
    1. Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2021) Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern-based qualitative analytic approaches. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(1), 37-47.

Publication types