Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2021 Oct 1;138(4):593-602.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004531.

The Michigan Plan for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare in Pregnancy Prenatal Care Recommendations

Alex Friedman Peahl  1 , Christopher M Zahn, Mark Turrentine, Wanda Barfield, Sean D Blackwell, Suni Jo Roberts, Allison R Powell, Vineet Chopra, Steven J Bernstein
Affiliations
Practice Guideline

The Michigan Plan for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare in Pregnancy Prenatal Care Recommendations

Alex Friedman Peahl et al. Obstet Gynecol. .

Abstract

Objective: To describe MiPATH (the Michigan Plan for Appropriate Tailored Healthcare in pregnancy) panel process and key recommendations for prenatal care delivery.

Methods: We conducted an appropriateness study using the RAND Corporation and University of California Los Angeles Appropriateness Method, a modified e-Delphi process, to develop MiPATH recommendations using sequential steps: 1) definition and scope of key terms, 2) literature review and data synthesis, 3) case scenario development, 4) panel selection and scenario revisions, and 5) two rounds of panel appropriateness ratings with deliberation. Recommendations were developed for average-risk pregnant individuals (eg, individuals not requiring care by maternal-fetal medicine specialists). Because prenatal services (eg, laboratory tests, vaccinations) have robust evidence, panelists considered only how services are delivered (eg, visit frequency, telemedicine).

Results: The appropriateness of key aspects of prenatal care delivery across individuals with and without common medical and pregnancy complications, as well as social and structural determinants of health, was determined by the panel. Panelists agreed that a risk assessment for medical, social, and structural determinants of health should be completed as soon as individuals present for care. Additionally, the panel provided recommendations for: 1) prenatal visit schedules (care initiation, visit timing and frequency, routine pregnancy assessments), 2) integration of telemedicine (virtual visits and home devices), and 3) care individualization. Panelists recognized significant gaps in existing evidence and the need for policy changes to support equitable care with changing practices.

Conclusion: The MiPATH recommendations offer more flexible prenatal care delivery for average-risk individuals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial Disclosure Steven J. Bernstein reports money was paid to his institution from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan/Blue Care Network, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, and the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. He also served and currently serves as an external physician on the Utilization Management and Clinical Quality Committees for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and Blue Care Network. He received an honorarium for each committee meeting. The other authors did not report any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Prenatal visit schedule based on recommended services. Data from American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Antepartum record. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2017. Available at: https://www.acog.org/clinical-information/obstetric-patient-record-forms. Retrieved July 2, 2021.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Appropriateness of monitoring and remote monitoring of routine pregnancy assessments. BP, blood pressure; FHT, fetal heart tones; Wt, weight; FH, fundal height.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kilpatrick SJ, Papile L, Macones GA. Guidelines for perinatal care. 8th ed. American Academy of Pediatrics, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2017.
    1. Ultrasound in pregnancy. Practice Bulletin No. 175. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:e241–56. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001815 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gestational diabetes mellitus. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 190. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2018;131:e49–64. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002501 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ultrasound in pregnancy. Practice Bulletin No. 175. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128:e241–56. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001815. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Importance of social determinants of health and cultural awareness in the delivery of reproductive health care. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 729. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2018;131:e43–8. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002459 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types